SONSTENG PRACTICUM MATTER · FACTS

THE FACTS OF THE SCENARIO

Facts — In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Delphine A. Karsgaard, a Minnesota Attorney

Every labelled fact below is the single source the pages are generated from. Change a value here and everything rendered from it follows on the next publish; passages that restate it in prose are found and drafted for review, never changed silently.

Caption restated in 2 passages (each needs its own edit)

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Delphine A. Karsgaard, a Minnesota Attorney

Open date restated in 3 passages (each needs its own edit)

2025-12-01

As of date restated in 1 passage (each needs its own edit)

2026-06-30

Client name restated in 27 passages (each needs its own edit)

Delphine A. Karsgaard

Matter summary not yet mentioned in the prose

Defense of a Minnesota attorney against a Petition for Disciplinary Action alleging neglect of a client matter, a candor violation in a supporting affidavit, and a supervisory failure; goal is to contest the candor charge and argue for a proportional, lesser sanction.

Intake date not yet mentioned in the prose

2025-11-28

Referral source not yet mentioned in the prose

referral from a bar association colleague

Result restated in 3 passages (each needs its own edit)

clear

Notes not yet mentioned in the prose

No current or former firm representation of Ms. Dieterle, the OLPR, Larkspur Market Holdings, or Ms. Achterberg. No personal or financial interest adverse to the client. Cleared to represent the respondent.

Checked date not yet mentioned in the prose

2025-11-29

Rate not yet mentioned in the prose

250

Engagement date restated in 3 passages (each needs its own edit)

2025-12-01

Adding a fact records it here first — it appears in the prose only through drafted mentions you approve.