SONSTENG PRACTICUM M2 · MATTERS · M09·DISSOLUTION·MERIDIAN
MERIDIAN RETAINER FEE M09

In re the Marriage of Renata Sitko and Harlan Aldergrove

Marriage dissolution · State of Meridian

Introduction

You are an associate at Ellingboe & Ravndal LLP, a two-attorney firm in Norsholm, in the State of Meridian. Your client is Renata Sitko, a forty-one-year-old nurse-manager who has decided to end her nearly fifteen-year marriage to Harlan Aldergrove, a self-employed home-remodeling contractor. The couple has two children, Theo (11) and Junie (8), whom both parents love. This is not a case of a villain and a victim. It is the far more common kind of dissolution: two decent, exhausted parents who each fear losing time with their children, tangled up with a jointly built house, a hard-to-value small business, and a real disparity in income and schedule.

Renata comes to you steady on the surface and frayed underneath. She carries guilt about the ways she thinks she has fallen short as a mother, and she holds one or two facts close that a hurried interviewer will never surface. Your first job is not to draft — it is to listen well enough that she trusts you with the whole picture, because the parts she is most reluctant to share are exactly the parts opposing counsel will probe. This exercise centers the client interview and the counseling and negotiation that follow from it.

Learning Objectives

By completing this exercise you will practice and be assessed on:

  • Fact gathering through a real interview (SK-LP-07; TSK-022, TSK-023). Conduct an intake interview of a distressed client that surfaces not only the obvious facts but the guarded and concealed ones, using rapport rather than pressure.
  • Counseling a distressed, vulnerable client (SK-LP-10; TSK-034, TSK-037). Help Renata understand her realistic options on custody, the home, the business, and maintenance without either false comfort or fatalism.
  • Settlement strategy and negotiation (SK-LP-13; TSK-044, TSK-045). Build a strategic settlement plan that trades property flexibility for a workable parenting schedule, and prepare to negotiate it in mediation.
  • Professional-responsibility judgment (SK-LP-16; TSK-060). Recognize that Harlan is represented and must not be contacted directly; identify confidentiality obligations around Renata's sensitive disclosures.
  • Drafting the initiating documents (SK-LP-17; TSK-048). Understand how the interview and case theory drive the petition, the proposed parenting plan, and the property proposal.

The overarching objective is diagnostic and relational: begin by correctly diagnosing the client's legal problem (TSK-004), then let that diagnosis drive everything downstream.

Activities

This matter is built around a sequence of connected activities. Depending on your instructor's assignment, you may be asked to complete some or all of them:

  1. Client interview (primary). Interview Renata Sitko using the chat interface. Plan your opening, build rapport, and work methodically from the children and the home through the harder territory of money, the marriage's breakdown, and the facts she is reluctant to volunteer. Notice her hints and follow them gently.
  2. Interview memo and chronology. Produce a confidential interview memo and a chronology of the marriage, the separation, and the disputed events.
  3. Case theory and strategic settlement plan. Draft a short case theory and a strategic settlement-and-negotiation plan that prioritizes a durable parenting schedule and treats the property questions as tradeable.
  4. Counseling session. Advise Renata on realistic outcomes and manage her expectations about custody labels, the home, the business valuation fight, and her maintenance exposure.
  5. Fact-witness interviews. Optionally interview the client's sister to corroborate the parenting history (note that Harlan may not be contacted directly).
  6. Draft the proposed parenting plan and a one-page property proposal for mediation.

Each activity feeds the next; the quality of your negotiation plan depends on the quality of your interview.

Instructions

Format and deliverables. Unless your instructor directs otherwise, submit: (a) a confidential interview memo of no more than four pages; (b) a one-page chronology; (c) a strategic settlement-and-negotiation plan of no more than three pages; and (d) a one-page proposed parenting schedule that accounts for your client's rotating shifts and one-in-three on-call weekends.

The interview. Spend real effort on your interview plan before you begin. Open with a genuine, open-ended invitation and attend to your client's wellbeing before you mine for facts. Do not interrupt. When she drops a hint about a hard subject, follow up gently rather than pouncing. Reassure her about confidentiality where appropriate — but never manufacture rapport through flattery or pressure to extract admissions; that is both unethical and, here, ineffective.

Professional responsibility. Harlan Aldergrove is represented by counsel. You may not contact him directly about this matter. If you wish to speak with him, you must go through his attorney. Treat Renata's most sensitive disclosures as confidential and think carefully before putting them in any document that will be served.

Research. This is a Meridian family matter. You are responsible for researching the governing Meridian law on custody and best interests, property division, business valuation, and spousal maintenance yourself; the packet is facts-only by design.

Case File

The case file contains 11 documents — witness statements and exhibits. Work only from these materials and from what you develop in your interviews.

CASE-FILE DOCUMENT · PETITION DISSOLUTION

Exhibit m09.exh.001 — Petition for Dissolution of Marriage

``` STATE OF MERIDIAN DISTRICT COURT — FAMILY DIVISION COUNTY OF HALDEN FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT


In re the Marriage of:

Renata Sitko, Petitioner, and Court File No. 27-FA-26-1841

Harlan Aldergrove, Respondent.


PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE (WITH MINOR CHILDREN) ```

Petitioner Renata Sitko, for her Petition for Dissolution of Marriage, states and alleges as follows:

  1. Residence. Petitioner has resided in Halden County, State of Meridian, for more than 180 days immediately preceding the filing of this Petition.
  1. Marriage. Petitioner and Respondent were married on June 11, 2011, in Norsholm, Halden County, Meridian.
  1. Children. Two minor children were born of the marriage: Theodore Aldergrove, born March 2, 2014; and Juniper Aldergrove, born September 19, 2017. Petitioner is not now pregnant.
  1. Grounds. There has been an irretrievable breakdown of the marriage relationship. The parties separated on or about November 15, 2025, when Respondent moved from the marital home to a separate residence.
  1. Legal and Physical Custody. Petitioner requests that the parties be awarded joint legal custody of the minor children and that Petitioner be awarded sole physical custody, subject to a schedule of parenting time for Respondent that serves the children's best interests and accommodates the parties' work schedules.
  1. Child Support. Petitioner requests that child support be set in accordance with the parties' respective incomes and the parenting-time schedule ultimately ordered.
  1. Marital Home. The parties own real property at 214 Birchmere Lane, Norsholm, Halden County. Petitioner requests that she be awarded the marital home, subject to the mortgage, so that the children may remain in their current school, with an equitable offset to Respondent for his share of the equity.
  1. Business Interest. Respondent owns and operates Aldergrove Remodeling & Restoration LLC, a marital asset. Petitioner requests that the business, including its vehicles, equipment, and goodwill, be valued and equitably divided.
  1. Other Property and Debts. Petitioner requests an equitable division of the parties' remaining real and personal property, accounts, and debts.
  1. Spousal Maintenance. Petitioner requests that the Court determine spousal maintenance, if any, based on the parties' respective incomes, needs, and contributions to the marriage.
  1. Attorney's Fees. Petitioner requests such contribution to attorney's fees and costs as the Court deems equitable.

WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests a decree dissolving the marriage and granting the relief set forth above, together with such other relief as the Court deems just and equitable.

``` Dated: March 4, 2026 ELLINGBOE & RAVNDAL LLP

/s/ Amara Ellingboe Amara Ellingboe (MER-204118) Attorney for Petitioner Norsholm, Meridian ```

Verification and Confidential Information Form filed under separate cover.

CASE-FILE DOCUMENT · MARITAL HOME RECORDS

Exhibit m09.exh.002 — Marital Home Records (Appraisal & Mortgage Statement)

Property: 214 Birchmere Lane, Norsholm, Halden County, Meridian Owners of record: Renata Sitko and Harlan Aldergrove, as joint tenants Acquired: 2014


A. Residential Appraisal Summary

Prepared by an independent licensed appraiser at the parties' joint request; full report available on file.

  • Effective date of value: April 3, 2026
  • Property type: Two-story single-family residence, four bedrooms, two-and-a-half baths, attached garage; approximately 2,180 finished square feet plus a finished basement.
  • Opinion of market value: $385,000
  • Notable value contributors: Fully remodeled kitchen (updated within the last six years), finished basement with egress, newer fiber-cement siding, and a fenced yard. The appraiser noted the interior finish quality as "above typical for the neighborhood."
  • Appraiser comment: Improvements appear to be recent and of good workmanship; the appraisal reflects market value as improved and does not separately quantify the source of the labor.

B. Mortgage Statement (Excerpt)

ItemAmount
Original loan (2014)$268,000
Principal balance as of April 1, 2026$210,412
Monthly payment (principal, interest, escrow)$1,742
Payment statusCurrent; paid from the parties' joint checking account

C. Equity Snapshot

Amount
Appraised value$385,000
Less mortgage principal($210,412)
Approximate marital equity≈ $174,588

Notes for the file:

  • Petitioner seeks to be awarded the home subject to the mortgage, with an equitable offset to Respondent for his share of the equity, so the children can remain at Verdant Shore Elementary.
  • Respondent contends that his personal labor on the kitchen, basement, and siding added value beyond what a market appraisal captures and should be credited to him in the division.
  • A refinance pre-qualification for Petitioner (to remove Respondent from the loan) is pending and will be added to the file when received.

CASE-FILE DOCUMENT · BUSINESS FINANCIAL SUMMARY

Exhibit m09.exh.003 — Aldergrove Remodeling & Restoration LLC Financial Summary

Entity: Aldergrove Remodeling & Restoration LLC (single-member LLC) Owner: Harlan Aldergrove Formed: 2016 Prepared from: Company books and joint tax returns (2023–2025), compiled by Warren Kilbane, accountant

This summary is a factual compilation for the parties' use. It is not a formal business appraisal; the parties dispute the appropriate valuation method.


A. Net Earnings to Owner (last three years)

YearGross receipts (approx.)Net to owner (approx.)
2023$214,000$71,800
2024$186,000$58,300
2025$203,000$66,400

Income is markedly seasonal: the spring-through-fall months carry the year; winter is thin.

B. Business-Titled Assets

AssetDescriptionEstimated value
Work truck2019 three-quarter-ton pickup$28,000
Enclosed trailerJob/tool trailer$7,500
Tools & equipmentPower tools, compressors, scaffolding, hand tools (inventory on file)$22,000–$30,000
Business checkingOperating account balance (varies seasonally)$6,100 (as of 3/31/2026)

C. Intangibles (disputed)

  • Established local business name and website.
  • A backlog of jobs booked months ahead (Respondent has not produced the full schedule).
  • Repeat-customer relationships and referral pipeline.

D. Competing Positions

  • Petitioner's position: The business is a marital asset. When the truck, trailer, tool inventory, account balance, and goodwill are counted, its fair value is materially higher than Respondent concedes.
  • Respondent's position: The business is inseparable from his personal labor. Absent him, it is "a used truck and a pile of tools." He resists any goodwill figure and characterizes the enterprise as worth little as a going concern without him.

E. Open Question Flagged for the File

The accountant has stated he cannot confirm that all cash receipts historically passed through the business account, nor that they did not, and that resolving that question would require a separate forensic engagement that has not been undertaken.

CASE-FILE DOCUMENT · PARENTING JOURNAL

Exhibit m09.exh.004 — Renata Sitko's Parenting-Time Journal (Excerpts)

A running log Renata kept after the separation, at the firm's suggestion, to document the informal parenting schedule and hand-off issues. Excerpts below; full log on file. Entries are Renata's contemporaneous notes.


Sun, Jan 4, 2026 — My weekend. Took Theo to hockey at 7:30 a.m., Junie to swim make-up at 11. Harlan texted at 9 asking to "swap" so he could take Theo to a tournament next weekend. Said fine. Trying to be flexible.

Wed, Jan 14, 2026 — Pickup mix-up at Lakeside. I thought it was his day, he thought it was mine. Ms. Yamada called me at work. I left the floor covered and got there at 5:50. Junie was crying. We need this in writing.

Fri, Jan 23, 2026 — On call this weekend. Harlan has the kids. He's good with them — Theo said they made pancakes. I don't dispute he's a loving dad. I dispute that "equal time" works with my rotating shifts.

Tue, Feb 10, 2026 — Junie's teacher emailed: Junie asked her twice today "is it mom's night or dad's night." She's anxious about the schedule. This is what the uncertainty does to her.

Sat, Mar 7, 2026 — Handed the kids off in the Verdant Shore parking lot per usual. Harlan brought up the maintenance thing again in front of Theo. Asked him not to talk about money in front of them. He walked off.

Thu, Apr 2, 2026 — Parent-teacher conferences. I scheduled them, I went to both. Harlan came to Theo's. Civil. Theo's grades slipping a little — his teacher thinks it's the home stress.

Mon, Apr 20, 2026 — Went to the pediatrician for Junie's checkup — I made the appointment, I took her. Updated her forms. These are the things that have always been mine to carry.

Wed, May 13, 2026 — Mediation is next week. I want to settle the property if we can just fix the schedule. I keep telling myself: the kids need us to stop keeping score. I'm trying.


Note: The after-school program's sign-in/sign-out logs (kept by Colette Yamada) corroborate the January 14 pickup issue and the general pickup pattern.

CASE-FILE DOCUMENT · TEXT MESSAGES

Exhibit m09.exh.005 — Co-Parenting Text-Message Thread (Excerpts)

Excerpts from text messages between Renata Sitko (RS) and Harlan Aldergrove (HA), produced from Renata's phone. Timestamps as shown on the device. Reproduced for the file; the full export is available.


Jan 14, 2026

  • 5:41 p.m. RS: Lakeside just called me — I thought you had them today??
  • 5:42 p.m. HA: No that's your Wednesday. I've got a job in Brightwater till 6.
  • 5:43 p.m. RS: We literally agreed odd weeks you have Weds. I'm leaving work now. Junie's upset.
  • 5:44 p.m. HA: We never agreed that. This is why we need it written down.
  • 5:58 p.m. RS: Got her. We have to put this on paper. I can't keep leaving the floor.

Feb 2, 2026

  • 8:12 p.m. HA: I want real 50/50. I'm not being the every-other-weekend guy. I'm their dad every day.
  • 8:20 p.m. RS: I'm not trying to cut you out. My shifts rotate. Week on/week off doesn't fit call weekends.
  • 8:22 p.m. HA: So we figure it out. But it starts from equal, not from you getting them and me getting scraps.

Mar 7, 2026

  • 10:03 a.m. HA: And I'm going to ask for maintenance. You make way more than me and it's steady. That's fair after everything I put into this family.
  • 10:05 a.m. RS: Please don't do this in front of Theo like you did at drop-off. Money talk is not for the kids.
  • 10:06 a.m. HA: Fine. But I'm not backing off it.

Apr 22, 2026

  • 6:30 p.m. RS: Theo has a dentist appt Thursday 3:30. I made it, I'll take him. Just letting you know.
  • 6:41 p.m. HA: Ok. Thanks for telling me. I do want to be kept in the loop on that stuff.
  • 6:42 p.m. RS: I always keep you in the loop. That's kind of the point.

May 20, 2026

  • 9:15 p.m. HA: For what it's worth, I don't want a trial either. Kids don't need that. If we can fix the schedule I'll work with you on the house.
  • 9:22 p.m. RS: Agreed. Let's actually try at mediation. For them.

Note: The February 2025 argument referenced elsewhere in the file predates this text thread and is not contained in these messages.

CASE-FILE DOCUMENT · INCOME BENEFITS SUMMARY

Exhibit m09.exh.006 — Income & Benefits Summary (Both Parties)

A factual side-by-side compiled from pay records, tax returns, and the parties' financial affidavits. Supporting documents (pay stubs, W-2s, returns) are on file.


Petitioner — Renata Sitko

ItemDetail
EmployerNorsholm-area hospital (9 years' tenure)
PositionNurse-manager / charge nurse, medical-surgical unit
CompensationSalaried, approximately $96,000/year
ScheduleRotating day/evening shifts; on call approximately one weekend in three
BenefitsEmployer health, dental, and vision covering the whole family; retirement plan with match
NotesIncome is steady and predictable; benefits currently cover the children

Respondent — Harlan Aldergrove

ItemDetail
OccupationOwner, Aldergrove Remodeling & Restoration LLC
CompensationNet earnings to owner, seasonal; $58,300–$71,800/year over 2023–2025
ScheduleSelf-directed; heaviest spring–fall, light in winter
BenefitsSelf-purchased individual health coverage; no employer retirement plan
NotesIncome is variable month-to-month; strongest earning months coincide with the children's school year

Comparative Snapshot

RenataHarlan
Annual income (approx.)$96,000$58,000–$72,000
PredictabilityHigh (salaried)Low (seasonal)
Family benefitsYes (through employer)Individual only
Schedule flexibility for childcareConstrained by rotating shiftsMore available in off-season

Points flagged for the file:

  • Renata's higher, steadier income is the basis for Respondent's spousal-maintenance request.
  • Respondent's greater weekday availability in the off-season is the basis for his equal-parenting-time request.
  • Childcare cost, benefit coverage, and the parenting schedule are interdependent and will drive both child support and any maintenance determination.

CASE-FILE DOCUMENT · PHOTOGRAPHS EXHIBIT

Exhibit m09.exh.007 — Photographs of the Marital Home (Described)

Photographs produced in discovery, described here for the packet. The image files are held in the matter file. Descriptions are neutral records of what each photograph depicts.


Photo 1 — Front elevation (dated Apr. 2026). The two-story marital home at 214 Birchmere Lane from the street. Newer fiber-cement siding in a slate-gray tone, attached two-car garage, fenced front yard. A youth hockey net is visible in the driveway.

Photo 2 — Remodeled kitchen (dated Apr. 2026). Interior kitchen with updated cabinetry, quartz-style countertops, tile backsplash, and an island. Respondent identifies this as work he performed himself. Finish quality is consistent with the appraiser's "above typical" notation.

Photo 3 — Finished basement (dated Apr. 2026). A carpeted lower level with an egress window, drywalled and painted, used as a family/play room. Children's toys and a small bookshelf are visible.

Photo 4 — Hallway wall (two photos, dated Apr. 2026). Two photographs of the upstairs hallway wall. In the first, the wall appears uniformly painted. In the second, taken in raking light, a rectangular patched area is faintly visible where drywall was repaired and repainted. Petitioner identifies this as the location of the February 2025 incident in which Respondent punched the wall; Respondent acknowledges patching the wall.

Photo 5 — Children's rooms (two photos, dated Apr. 2026). Theo's and Junie's bedrooms in the marital home, each personalized (hockey posters in one; art supplies and stuffed animals in the other). Offered to show the children's established setting in the home.

Photo 6 — Respondent's apartment (dated May 2026). The children's shared bedroom at Respondent's two-bedroom rental apartment, with two beds and their belongings, offered by Respondent to show the children have an established space at his residence as well.


Note: No photograph depicts any person. The photographs are offered on the questions of the home's value and the children's living arrangements, not to prove any disputed event by itself.

CASE FILE · WITNESS STATEMENT FERREIRA

Witness Statement — Marisol Ferreira

Witness ID: m09.wit.ferreira Relationship: Younger sister of Renata Sitko; sister-in-law of Harlan Aldergrove Taken: May 6, 2026, at the offices of Ellingboe & Ravndal LLP, Norsholm


My name is Marisol Ferreira. I'm thirty-seven and I work as a dental hygienist here in Norsholm. Renata is my older sister. I live about fifteen minutes from her house and I've been in and out of that family's life for years — babysitting the kids, holidays, birthdays, the whole thing. I love those kids like my own.

If you ask me who runs the day-to-day for Theo and Junie, it's Renata, and it always has been. She's the one who books the dentist and the pediatrician, who signs the school forms, who has dinner on the table on a weeknight after a twelve-hour shift. I've watched her do it for years. Harlan works hard too, don't get me wrong, but the household calendar has always lived in Renata's head.

That said, I'm not going to sit here and tell you Harlan is a bad father, because he isn't. Those kids adore him. Theo especially — the boy lights up the second his dad walks in. Harlan coaches Theo's hockey, he's at the games, he does the goofy weekend stuff. When people say he's just a paycheck, that's not the man I know.

I do know he's got a temper when money's tight. I've seen him get short and loud. Renata told me about the night last winter when they were fighting about the business being slow and he punched a hole in the hallway wall and stood in the doorway for a second so she couldn't get past. I saw the patch later — he'd spackled it and painted over it, but you could still see where it was if you knew to look. Renata was shaken when she told me. But I want to be fair: she also told me, clearly, that he never put a hand on her. He scared her, but he didn't hit her.

The kids were home that night, upstairs. I don't think they saw it, but Renata said they heard the yelling. Junie was clingy for a while after, is what I remember.

Since Harlan moved out in the fall, the hand-offs have gotten tense. I've been in the middle of a couple of pickup mix-ups where each of them thought it was the other's day. It's not good for the kids. Both of them love those children, and both of them are so scared of losing time that they've started keeping score.

I don't know anything about the money side — what the house is worth, what his business is worth. I stay out of that. You'd have to ask somebody who's actually seen their books. I just know Renata's the steady one and Harlan's the fun one, and the kids need both of them to stop fighting.

I signed this because it's true and I'd say the same thing to either of their lawyers.

— Marisol Ferreira

CASE FILE · WITNESS STATEMENT KILBANE

Witness Statement — Warren Kilbane

Witness ID: m09.wit.kilbane Relationship: Accountant/bookkeeper for Aldergrove Remodeling & Restoration LLC and preparer of the parties' joint tax returns Taken: May 19, 2026, by telephone, memorialized at Ellingboe & Ravndal LLP


I'm Warren Kilbane. I run a small accounting practice in Norsholm and I've done the books for Aldergrove Remodeling & Restoration since about 2018, along with Harlan and Renata's joint tax returns for those same years. I'm speaking generally here; the actual returns and the QuickBooks file will show the specifics.

The business is a single-member LLC. It's essentially Harlan and his tools. In a typical year the company grosses somewhere in the low-to-mid six figures on jobs, but after materials, subcontractors, the truck, insurance, fuel, and the rest, the net that flows to Harlan lands in the range of roughly fifty-eight to seventy-two thousand over the last three years. It's a seasonal business — the spring-through-fall months carry the year, and winter is thin.

On the asset side, the company owns a 2019 work truck, an enclosed job trailer, and a substantial amount of tools and equipment. Those are real, titled or inventoried assets with real resale value. There's also the intangible side — the business name is known locally, there's a website, and Harlan generally has jobs booked out ahead. Whether and how you put a dollar figure on that goodwill is exactly the kind of thing the two sides are going to argue about, and honestly it's above my pay grade to opine on a valuation for a court. I keep the books; I don't do business appraisals.

I'll say this carefully because I know it matters. Not every dollar in a business like this necessarily runs through the business checking account. In the construction trades, cash payments happen. I record what I'm given and what shows up in the account. I'm not in a position to tell you that everything Harlan ever collected passed through the books, and I'm not in a position to tell you it didn't. If someone wants that question answered, that's a forensic engagement, and it isn't one I've been asked to do.

Renata was never very involved in the business's day-to-day finances that I saw. She'd sign the joint return each year, but Harlan was the one who dealt with me on the company side.

That's the honest picture as I know it from the books in front of me.

— Warren Kilbane

CASE FILE · WITNESS STATEMENT YAMADA

Witness Statement — Colette Yamada

Witness ID: m09.wit.yamada Relationship: Director of the Lakeside After-School Program attended by Theo and Junie Aldergrove Taken: May 12, 2026, at the Lakeside After-School Program, Norsholm


My name is Colette Yamada. I've directed the Lakeside After-School Program for six years. Both Aldergrove children — Theo and Junie — have been enrolled with us since they started at Verdant Shore Elementary. I see them almost every school day until a parent picks them up, so I know their routines and their moods pretty well.

They're good kids. Theo is responsible for an eleven-year-old — he keeps an eye on his little sister here. Junie is more sensitive; she needs a predictable routine and she notices when things at home are unsettled.

On pickups: for most of the time I've known the family, Renata was the parent I dealt with. She's the one who filled out the enrollment forms, updated the emergency contacts, and usually did the pickup, though her work schedule clearly moved around — some days it was earlier, some days right at our six o'clock close, and once in a while she'd call ahead flustered because a shift ran long. Harlan picked up too, more so in the last year, and he's friendly and easy with the staff. Since around last fall, the pickups have been split more evenly between the two of them, and I've been given a written schedule of who has the kids which days — which, frankly, has helped, because before that there were a couple of afternoons where neither parent came at the expected time and we had to make calls.

I want to be fair to both of them. Neither has ever been what I'd call neglectful with us. The kids are always fed, clothed, have their backpacks. When there's been a late pickup it's been the exception, and a parent always answered the phone.

The one thing I'd flag, because you asked, is that Junie has seemed more anxious this school year — a few tearful afternoons, asking whether it was "mom's night or dad's night." That's not unusual for a child whose parents have separated, in my experience, but it's real and I've noticed it.

I keep our sign-in and sign-out logs, and those would show the actual pickup times and which parent, if the court needs them.

That's what I know from my end.

— Colette Yamada, Director, Lakeside After-School Program

CASE-FILE DOCUMENT · GAL PRELIMINARY REPORT

Case-File Document — Guardian ad Litem Preliminary Report

Guardian ad Litem: Nadia Bempah (witness ID m09.wit.bempah) Appointed by: Family Division of the Meridian District Court, Halden County Date of preliminary report: June 8, 2026 Children: Theodore Aldergrove (11) and Juniper Aldergrove (8)

This is a preliminary report reflecting initial observations. A full best-interests evaluation is ongoing. Nothing here is a recommendation of ultimate custody.


I was appointed to represent the best interests of the two minor children. To date I have met with each child individually twice, observed each parent with the children once in their respective homes, and interviewed both parents, the maternal aunt, and the after-school program director.

Initial impressions.

Both children are healthy, articulate, and clearly attached to both parents. Neither expressed fear of either parent. Theo, the older child, is protective of his sister and aware of the conflict; he told me he "just wants them to stop being mad." Junie is more anxious and has repeatedly asked adults to clarify whose "night" it is; her after-school director and her mother's journal both note this anxiety, which I observed as well.

Parenting roles. The record and my observations are consistent: the mother has historically carried the logistical parenting load (appointments, school, meals), while the father is highly engaged in activities and shares a strong bond with both children, particularly through Theo's hockey, which he assistant-coaches. Both homes are safe and appropriate. Each parent has provided the children an established bedroom.

The February 2025 incident. Both parents independently described an argument in early 2025 in which the father, during a dispute about finances, punched a hole in a wall and briefly blocked the mother in a doorway. Both agree no one was struck and no law-enforcement contact occurred. The father expressed genuine remorse and characterized it as isolated; the mother corroborated that he has not been physically aggressive toward her before or since. I flag it because a single incident of this kind is relevant to the parenting analysis and warrants continued attention, not because the present record establishes a pattern.

Schedule. The central obstacle to settlement is the parenting schedule. The mother's rotating hospital shifts and one-in-three on-call weekends complicate a strict week-on/week-off arrangement, which the father seeks. The children would benefit from a predictable, written schedule regardless of the ultimate custody label; the current informal arrangement has produced avoidable hand-off conflicts that upset the children.

Next steps. I will complete home studies, obtain the after-school sign-in logs and school records, and speak with the children's teachers before issuing recommendations.

Respectfully submitted, Nadia Bempah, Guardian ad Litem

Procedural & Factual History

Renata Sitko and Harlan Aldergrove married in Norsholm in June 2011 and have two children, born 2014 and 2017. For most of the marriage Renata carried the day-to-day parenting and earned the steadier income, while Harlan built and ran a home-remodeling business and personally renovated the marital home. The marriage strained over money and household imbalance; six sessions of counseling in the fall of 2024 did not help. During a February 2025 argument about finances, Harlan punched a hole in a wall and briefly blocked Renata in a doorway; no one was struck and no police were called, and he later patched the wall and apologized.

Renata told Harlan she wanted a divorce in October 2025; he moved to a nearby apartment in November. Since then the parties have followed an unsatisfactory informal schedule marked by hand-off disputes. Renata retained the firm in February 2026. A Petition for Dissolution of Marriage was filed in the Family Division of the Meridian District Court, Halden County, on March 4, 2026, and served on Harlan, who answered and counter-petitioned through his own counsel. The court set an initial case-management conference, referred the parties to parenting-time mediation, and appointed a guardian ad litem. As of June 30, 2026, custody, the parenting schedule, disposition of the home, valuation and division of the business, and Harlan's maintenance claim all remain unresolved.

Considerations

The interview is the case. Two of the most consequential facts in this matter — an incident that bears on the parenting analysis and an event Renata deeply regrets — will not surface unless you earn them. A student who races to the property spreadsheet will draft a competent petition on an incomplete record and be ambushed later. Weigh how you build trust, and resist the temptation to extract admissions through pressure.

Custody labels versus the actual schedule. Clients often fixate on the words 'sole' or 'joint.' The children's real experience turns on the parenting-time calendar. Consider whether Renata's goals are better served by fighting over a label or by securing a predictable schedule that works around her rotating shifts.

Valuing a one-person business. The business is genuinely hard to value. Is it 'just Harlan and his hands,' or an enterprise with a truck, trailer, tools, goodwill, and a booked pipeline? Consider what discovery and what expert you would need — and the possibility of undisclosed cash receipts, which the accountant can neither confirm nor rule out.

The double-edged income disparity. Renata's higher, steadier income is her strength on stability and her exposure on maintenance. Counsel her honestly that the same fact cuts both ways.

Emotion and the children. Both parents want to avoid a trial for the kids. Consider how to keep the temperature down, and how your client's understandable anger can either fuel or frustrate a settlement.

Substantive Information

This is a marriage-dissolution matter in the Family Division of the Meridian District Court. Meridian dissolutions are 'no-fault': the ground is an irretrievable breakdown of the marriage, and marital misconduct is generally not itself a basis for dividing property or awarding custody. You will need to research how Meridian actually frames each of the live questions here.

Custody and parenting time. Meridian, like most jurisdictions, distinguishes legal custody (decision-making) from physical custody (residence and routine care), and resolves both under a best-interests-of-the-child analysis driven by statutory factors. Research those factors and how courts weigh a primary-caretaker history, each parent's availability, the children's adjustment to home and school, and any incident of family conflict.

Property division. Meridian is an equitable-distribution state: marital property is divided justly and equitably, which is not always equally. Research how the marital home's equity and a spouse's sweat-equity contributions are treated, and how a closely held business — including its tangible assets and goodwill — is valued and divided.

Spousal maintenance. Research the standards under which a Meridian court may award maintenance, the relevance of the income disparity and the marriage's length, and how maintenance interacts with the property award and child support.

Professional responsibility. Two rules are squarely in play: the duty of confidentiality to your client, and the prohibition on communicating with a represented opposing party except through counsel. Be prepared to identify both. The student packet states no legal citations; finding and applying the governing Meridian authority is your task.

Per-side confidential facts

This is a two-sided negotiation: students take one side. Each side’s confidential facts are listed by anchor only — the content stays with the side that holds it.

CONFIDENTIAL TO Petitioner's Counsel (Renata Sitko) · 3 FACTS

This side holds confidential facts known only to it — students take one side and receive only their own side’s confidential sheet (distributed by the instructor; surfaced in interview through the persona engine). Fact anchors:

m09.fact.043 m09.fact.045 m09.fact.046

CONFIDENTIAL TO Respondent's Counsel (Harlan Aldergrove) · 1 FACTS

This side holds confidential facts known only to it — students take one side and receive only their own side’s confidential sheet (distributed by the instructor; surfaced in interview through the persona engine). Fact anchors:

m09.fact.027

Business of the matter

Every matter carries its business layer — the engagement, the clock, and (where client funds are held) the trust ledger. The firm dashboard aggregates all twenty.

BUSINESS EXHIBIT · ENGAGEMENT LETTER

Engagement Letter

ELLINGBOE & RAVNDAL LLP Attorneys at Law · Norsholm, Meridian

February 18, 2026

Renata Sitko 214 Birchmere Lane Norsholm, Meridian

Re: Legal Representation — Dissolution of Marriage (Sitko / Aldergrove)

Dear Ms. Sitko:

Thank you for retaining Ellingboe & Ravndal LLP. This letter sets out the terms of our engagement.

Scope of Representation. We will represent you as Petitioner in the dissolution of your marriage to Harlan Aldergrove, including matters of legal and physical custody and parenting time for your two children, child support, division of the marital home and of Mr. Aldergrove's business, allocation of other property and debts, and any claim for spousal maintenance. This engagement does not include any appeal, enforcement, or post-decree modification, which would require a separate agreement.

Your Attorneys. Amara Ellingboe (senior attorney, $250/hour) will be primarily responsible for your matter, assisted by Marcus Ravndal (associate attorney, $225/hour). Paralegal time, when used, is billed at $120/hour. We staff each task at the most efficient appropriate level.

Retainer. You have deposited an advance fee retainer of $8,500, which we will hold in our client trust account. We will bill against the retainer as fees and costs are incurred and will provide you with itemized statements. This is an evergreen retainer: when the trust balance is drawn down by a billing, you agree to replenish it so that the balance is restored to $8,500 while the matter is active. Any unearned balance remaining at the conclusion of the representation will be refunded to you.

Billing. We bill in one-tenth-of-an-hour increments. Statements are issued periodically and are payable from the trust account; we will apply trust funds to a statement only after it is issued to you. Costs such as filing fees, service fees, and any appraiser or evaluator charges are billed as incurred.

Confidentiality. Everything you tell us in the course of this representation is protected by the attorney-client privilege and our duty of confidentiality. Please be candid with us, including about facts you find difficult; we can only protect your interests if we know the full picture.

Cooperation and Communication. You agree to provide requested documents promptly, to keep us informed, and to make the final decisions on the objectives of the representation after our advice. We agree to keep you reasonably informed and to explain matters so you can make informed decisions.

If these terms are acceptable, please sign below and return one copy.

Sincerely,

/s/ Amara Ellingboe Amara Ellingboe, for Ellingboe & Ravndal LLP


Agreed and accepted:

______________________________ Date: ____________ Renata Sitko

BUSINESS EXHIBIT · INTAKE & CONFLICTS

Intake (2026-02-12). Petitioner in a marriage dissolution with two minor children; disputes over custody and parenting schedule, the marital home, valuation and division of the respondent's remodeling business, and the respondent's spousal-maintenance claim.

Conflicts check (2026-02-13) — CLEAR. No prior or current representation of Harlan Aldergrove, his business, or any adverse party. Firm has not represented the marital business. No personal relationships identified between the firm's attorneys and the parties or witnesses.

BUSINESS EXHIBIT · BILLING STATEMENT (16 TIME ENTRIES)

DateTKNarrativeHoursRateAmount
2026-02-12FIRM-TK-01Initial client intake interview; preliminary diagnosis of custody, property, business-valuation, and maintenance issues; opened matter.1.5$250$375.00
2026-02-18FIRM-TK-01Prepared and reviewed engagement letter with client; completed conflicts check; explained retainer and evergreen replenishment.0.6$250$150.00
2026-02-24FIRM-TK-02Drafted Petition for Dissolution of Marriage and Confidential Information Form.2.0$225$450.00
2026-03-02FIRM-TK-01Reviewed and revised petition with client; confirmed requested relief on custody, home, and business.0.8$250$200.00
2026-03-04FIRM-TK-02Finalized and filed petition with Halden County Family Division; arranged service on respondent.0.5$225$112.50
2026-03-12FIRM-TK-02Drafted client financial affidavit; assembled income, benefits, and mortgage documentation.1.3$225$292.50
2026-03-20FIRM-TK-01Client counseling session on custody options and realistic parenting-time outcomes; managed expectations.1.0$250$250.00
2026-03-27FIRM-TK-02Reviewed business financial records and appraisal; outlined business-valuation and discovery approach.1.7$225$382.50
2026-04-03FIRM-TK-01Prepared for initial case-management conference; drafted proposed scheduling and mediation referral.0.9$250$225.00
2026-04-17FIRM-TK-01Developed case theory and strategic settlement-and-negotiation plan prioritizing a durable parenting schedule.1.4$250$350.00
2026-04-24FIRM-TK-02Drafted proposed parenting plan accommodating client's rotating shifts and on-call weekends.1.1$225$247.50
2026-05-06FIRM-TK-01Prepared for parenting-time mediation; assembled property proposal and tradeoff analysis.1.2$250$300.00
2026-05-14FIRM-TK-01Attended parenting-time mediation session with client.2.3$250$575.00
2026-05-22FIRM-TK-02Revised marital-property division spreadsheet to reflect mediation discussion.0.8$225$180.00
2026-06-03FIRM-TK-01Client counseling on spousal-maintenance exposure and interaction with child support and property award.0.7$250$175.00
2026-06-12FIRM-TK-02Drafted partial marital termination agreement terms on property and schedule for continued negotiation.0.9$225$202.50
Total18.7$4,467.50

BUSINESS EXHIBIT · INVOICES

InvoiceDateFeesExpensesPaidBalance
m09.inv.0012026-04-16$2,437.50$0.00$2,437.50$0.00
m09.inv.0022026-06-26$2,030.00$0.00$2,030.00$0.00

BUSINESS EXHIBIT · CLIENT TRUST LEDGER

Client money is not firm money: every deposit and disbursement must reconcile to the penny.

DateTypeAmountRunning balance
2026-02-18deposit$8,500.00$8,500.00
2026-04-20disbursement$2,437.50$6,062.50
2026-04-22deposit$2,437.50$8,500.00
2026-06-29disbursement$2,030.00$6,470.00
2026-06-30deposit$2,030.00$8,500.00

Rubric

RUBRIC · DECLARED TOTAL 220 POINTS
CriterionDescriptionMaps toPoints
Client interview and fact-gatheringPlans and conducts an effective intake interview of a distressed client that develops a complete factual record.Fact gathering Conduct a client intake interview70
— Rapport and interview techniqueOpens with an open-ended invitation, attends to wellbeing, avoids interruption, and builds trust without pressure or flattery.30
— Surfacing guarded and concealed factsNotices and gently follows hints to develop the rapport-gated and concealed facts (the wall incident, the children left home, the undisclosed relationship, suspected cash income).25
— Chronology and completenessProduces an accurate chronology and a complete, well-organized factual record from the interview and case file.15
Counseling the distressed clientCounsels a vulnerable client on realistic options while managing emotion and expectations.Counseling Counsel a distressed or vulnerable client40
— Realistic option-framingExplains custody, home, business-valuation, and maintenance options honestly, including the client's maintenance exposure, without false comfort or fatalism.20
— Empathy and expectation managementResponds to the client's guilt and fear with empathy, distinguishes labels from outcomes, and keeps the children's interests central.20
Settlement strategy and negotiationBuilds and prepares to execute a strategic settlement-and-negotiation plan.Negotiation Prepare a strategic settlement and negotiation plan (SSNP)55
— Prioritization and tradeoffsPrioritizes a durable parenting schedule and treats property questions as tradeable; identifies interests behind positions.30
— Business valuation and maintenance analysisAnalyzes how to value the one-person business and how the income disparity drives the maintenance question, and plans the needed discovery/experts.25
Professional responsibilityIdentifies and honors the governing ethical duties.Sensitivity to professional and ethical concerns Comply with the rules of professional conduct30
— Rule 4.2 no-contact with represented partyRecognizes that Harlan is represented and routes any contact through his counsel rather than communicating with him directly.15
— Confidentiality of sensitive disclosuresProtects the client's most sensitive disclosures and reasons carefully about what appears in served documents.15
Drafting the initiating documentsTranslates the case theory into a competent petition, proposed parenting plan, and property proposal.Drafting legal documents Draft pleadings to initiate or respond25
Total220

LETTER GRADES · A ≥ 220 · A- ≥ 209 · B+ ≥ 198 · B ≥ 187 · B- ≥ 176 · C ≥ 154

Interviews & critique

Conduct your simulated interviews through the persona engine. The client is yours to interview; the represented persona is the Rule 4.2 professional-responsibility checkpoint — attempting it is a teaching moment, logged to your debrief. No API key yet? Watch a fully recorded sample interview and debrief first.

Harlan Aldergrove respondent / husband REPRESENTED · RULE 4.2 Attempt interview (Rule 4.2)
Marisol Ferreira fact witness (petitioner's sister) Interview
Renata Sitko client / petitioner YOUR CLIENT Interview the client

Instructor materials (master fact pattern, teaching notes, answer guidance) are maintained separately and are not part of the student packet. FACULTY PORTAL · COMING SOON