SONSTENG PRACTICUM M2 · MATTERS · M08·JUVENILE·MERIDIAN
MERIDIAN HOURLY FEE M08

In re the Welfare of T.M., a Minor

Juvenile delinquency · State of Meridian

Introduction

You are an attorney at Ellingboe & Ravndal LLP, a two-lawyer general practice in Norsholm, and you have been appointed to represent a fifteen-year-old, Tobias Merrow, in a juvenile delinquency matter in the Juvenile Division of the Meridian District Court, Halden County. The State alleges that Tobias walked out of a big-box electronics store, VoltHaus, holding an unpaid gaming console, and that in the doorway he shoved a loss-prevention officer who was trying to stop him, knocking the officer down. Tobias tells a different story: two older teenagers grabbed the console, pushed the box into his hands near the doors, and ran, and he only pushed past the guard in a panic. The State has filed a petition alleging conduct that would be theft and fifth-degree assault if committed by an adult, and it has offered a diversion program that would leave Tobias with no adjudication if he completes it. Your client is frightened and his single mother is overwhelmed. Your job in this exercise is to interview the family, develop the facts, and help them decide between accepting diversion and contesting the petition — all while handling a vulnerable minor client and a live professional-responsibility trap.

Objectives

By completing this exercise you will practice the core competencies of a juvenile defense intake and disposition workup. Specifically, you will: (1) Gather facts from a frightened minor through a developmentally appropriate, non-leading interview, eliciting the client's own account before it is shaped by the adults around him — exercising fact gathering (SK-LP-07) and TSK-022 (client intake interview) and TSK-023 (investigate and develop the facts). (2) Counsel a distressed, vulnerable client and an anxious parent without losing the child's confidence or the parent's trust — exercising counseling (SK-LP-10) and TSK-037 (counsel a distressed or vulnerable client). (3) Diagnose the matter and build a disposition strategy, weighing the diversion offer against a contested hearing, and preparing a negotiation plan on restitution and terms — exercising diagnosis and planning (SK-LP-01), negotiation (SK-LP-13), TSK-034 (advise on options and risks), TSK-035 (counsel on settlement versus proceeding), TSK-044 (prepare a strategic settlement and negotiation plan), and TSK-045 (conduct a negotiation). (4) Spot and navigate the professional-responsibility issues — most pointedly the Rule 4.2 no-contact problem posed by the represented co-respondent — exercising sensitivity to professional and ethical concerns (SK-LP-16) and TSK-060 (comply with the rules of professional conduct).

Activities

This exercise unfolds in a sequence of connected activities. First, you will review the case file — the police and loss-prevention reports, the delinquency petition, the store's inventory record, the diversion offer, the CCTV still-frame log, and the witness statements — and build a working chronology, flagging the two evidentiary gaps (the obscured handoff and the ambiguous doorway contact). Second, you will conduct a simulated client interview with Tobias through the chat engine, practicing open-ended, non-judgmental questioning to draw out his account, including the facts he will only share once he trusts you. Third, you will interview his mother, Dana, separately, managing her distress and guilt while gathering what she knows. Fourth, you will consider whether and how you may contact the co-respondent, Kellan — and confront the Rule 4.2 barrier when you try. Fifth, you will analyze the diversion offer against the risks of a contested hearing and prepare a short strategic settlement-and-negotiation plan, including your position on restitution given that the console was recovered undamaged. Finally, you will counsel the family on the decision, in language a scared fifteen-year-old and an overwhelmed parent can actually use.

Instructions

Work through the exercise in the order the activities describe, and produce the following deliverables. (1) A fact chronology of the incident and the procedural posture, expressly identifying every place the accounts conflict and every gap in the proof. (2) An interview plan for Tobias and a separate one for Dana, listing your opening, your open-ended prompts, the rapport-building moves you will use, and the sensitive areas you expect to reach only with trust. Then conduct both interviews in the chat engine. (3) A short professional-responsibility memo identifying the Rule 4.2 issue with the represented co-respondent and stating exactly what you may and may not do, and how you would proceed if you needed information from him. (4) A strategic settlement-and-negotiation plan (SSNP) comparing acceptance of diversion with a contested hearing, setting your restitution position, and identifying your best- and worst-case outcomes and your client's priorities. (5) A counseling script or outline for advising Tobias and Dana on the decision, written for a lay audience. Do your own legal research for any doctrine you rely on; the packet is facts-only by design. Keep the child's stated priorities — avoiding a record, not being seen as a snitch — at the center of your recommendation.

Case File

The case file contains 9 documents — witness statements and exhibits. Work only from these materials and from what you develop in your interviews.

CASE-FILE DOCUMENT · POLICE REPORT

Norsholm Police Department — Incident Report (EXHIBIT m08.exh.001)

Report No.: NPD-2026-041537 Reporting Officer: Officer Trent Bagley, Norsholm Police Department (Witness ID: m08.wit.bagley) Date/Time of Incident: Saturday, March 14, 2026, approx. 1642 hours Location: VoltHaus Electronics, Riverside Commons, Norsholm, Halden County Classification: Juvenile — theft; assault (fifth degree) referred to juvenile intake


SUMMARY

On the above date and time, I was dispatched to VoltHaus Electronics on a report of a retail theft and a store employee assaulted. On arrival I made contact with loss-prevention officer Curtis Vanderhoek, who was holding a juvenile male at the edge of the parking lot with the assistance of another store employee.

JUVENILE

The juvenile was identified through his mother as Tobias Merrow, DOB on file, age 15, of Norsholm. He had no identification on him. He was cooperative and visibly upset during contact.

STATEMENTS OBTAINED

Vanderhoek reported he observed a group of three male subjects near the gaming display; that one older subject removed a boxed Nexus X console from the display; that the box was transferred to the juvenile near the front doors; that two older subjects fled the store on foot; and that when he attempted to stop the juvenile in the entry vestibule, the juvenile pushed him, causing him to fall against a display and scrape his elbow. Vanderhoek declined medical attention.

The juvenile stated the two older subjects handed him the box and ran, that he panicked, and that he pushed past the officer trying to leave but did not intend to injure anyone.

A sales associate, N. Quintero, was identified as a partial witness and a separate statement was arranged.

PROPERTY

One (1) Nexus X gaming console, boxed, shelf value $549.99, recovered outside the first set of entry doors where the juvenile dropped it. Box scuffed; unit intact. Returned to store per manager.

DISPOSITION

The two older subjects were not located. The juvenile was released to his mother, Dana Merrow, at the scene. Matter referred to the Halden County juvenile intake unit for a charging decision. Store CCTV preserved by management and requested.

Officer T. Bagley, #4471 Norsholm Police Department

CASE-FILE DOCUMENT · LP INCIDENT REPORT

VoltHaus Loss-Prevention Incident Report (EXHIBIT m08.exh.002)

Store: VoltHaus Electronics #218, Riverside Commons, Norsholm Incident Date/Time: March 14, 2026, 4:38 p.m. Prepared By: Curtis Vanderhoek, Loss-Prevention Officer Report Date: March 14, 2026


INCIDENT TYPE: Grab-and-run theft; physical contact with LP officer

MERCHANDISE INVOLVED:

  • 1 × Nexus X Gaming Console (SKU 4471-NX), shelf price $549.99
  • Recovered: Yes — dropped at exterior of vestibule doors
  • Condition on recovery: box scuffed, console unit undamaged; returned to sellable stock
  • Net merchandise loss after recovery: $0.00

NARRATIVE: Observed three young male subjects loitering at the gaming endcap, exhibiting camera-checking behavior. Subject 1 (older, dark hooded sweatshirt) removed a boxed Nexus X from the display pallet. Group moved toward front entrance. Box was passed to Subject 3 (younger, gray jacket) near the vestibule; exact transfer partially obscured from my sightline by the seasonal endcap. Subjects 1 and 2 fled on foot through the north doors and were not apprehended.

I positioned myself in the vestibule and identified myself to Subject 3, directing him to stop and surrender the merchandise. Subject 3 did not comply and pushed past me with both hands, contacting my chest and causing me to lose balance and strike the freestanding accessory display, going down to one knee. Minor abrasion to right elbow; self-treated with store first-aid kit; no medical treatment sought; remained on shift.

Subject 3 dropped the merchandise at the exterior doors and fled into the lot, where he was detained by me and associate M. Reymann pending police arrival.

CCTV: Ceiling cameras 6 and 9 preserved. Camera 9 covers the vestibule contact. The merchandise handoff is partially blocked on both cameras by the endcap.

LAW ENFORCEMENT: Norsholm PD responded; Officer Bagley took custody of the scene. Juvenile released to parent.

C. Vanderhoek, LP #218-03

CASE-FILE DOCUMENT · DELINQUENCY PETITION

Delinquency Petition (EXHIBIT m08.exh.003)

``` STATE OF MERIDIAN DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF HALDEN FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT JUVENILE DIVISION


In re the Welfare of T.M., a Minor. PETITION FOR DELINQUENCY


```

Petitioner: State of Meridian, by the Halden County Attorney

Child: T.M., a male child, age 15, residing in Norsholm, Halden County. (Identified by initials per Juvenile Division practice; records confidential.)

Parent/Guardian: Dana Merrow, mother.


COUNT I — Theft

The Petitioner alleges that on or about March 14, 2026, in Halden County, the above-named child took, and exercised control over, movable property of VoltHaus Electronics, namely one Nexus X gaming console of a value alleged to exceed the statutory threshold, without consent and with intent to deprive the owner permanently of possession — conduct that would constitute theft if committed by an adult.

COUNT II — Assault in the Fifth Degree

The Petitioner further alleges that on the same date and place, the above-named child intentionally inflicted, or attempted to inflict, bodily harm upon Curtis Vanderhoek — conduct that would constitute assault in the fifth degree if committed by an adult.


PRAYER FOR RELIEF

Petitioner requests that the child be adjudged delinquent and that the Court make such disposition as is in the child's best interests and the interests of public safety, or, in the alternative, that the child be referred to an approved diversion or accountability program.

Dated: March 27, 2026

/s/ Assistant Halden County Attorney Halden County Attorney's Office Norsholm, Meridian

Assigned: Hon. Consuela Escamilla, Juvenile Division.

CASE-FILE DOCUMENT · STORE INVENTORY RECORD

VoltHaus Inventory & Recovery Record (EXHIBIT m08.exh.004)

Store: VoltHaus Electronics #218, Riverside Commons, Norsholm Record Date: March 15, 2026 Prepared By: Store Operations Manager (on file)


FieldValue
ItemNexus X Gaming Console
SKU4471-NX
Shelf / retail price$549.99
Wholesale cost to store$402.00
Quantity involved1
Recovered?Yes — at exterior vestibule doors, 3/14/2026
Condition on recoveryRetail box scuffed at one corner; console unit sealed and undamaged
Returned to sellable stock?Yes (box replaced from damaged-box stock; unit re-boxed)
Net merchandise loss after recovery$0.00
Claimed restitutionTo be determined; store has not yet submitted a fixed restitution figure

NOTES: The console recovered outside the doors matches the single unit that reconciliation showed missing from the gaming pallet after the incident. Because the unit was recovered intact and returned to stock, the store's actual out-of-pocket loss is limited to the scuffed retail box, which the store values as negligible. Any restitution demand and any characterization of the theft value for charging purposes remain open questions for the parties.

This record is provided as a business record of the store's inventory reconciliation for the date in question.

CASE-FILE DOCUMENT · DIVERSION OFFER LETTER

Juvenile Diversion Offer Letter (EXHIBIT m08.exh.005)

Halden County Attorney's Office Juvenile Division — Diversion Unit Norsholm, Meridian

Date: April 20, 2026 Re: In re the Welfare of T.M., a Minor — Diversion Offer To: Counsel of record for the child; Dana Merrow, parent


Dear Counsel:

Following review of the referral in the above matter, our office is prepared to offer the child, T.M., placement in the county's juvenile diversion program in lieu of proceeding on the delinquency petition. The offer is as follows.

Terms of the diversion offer:

  1. The child accepts responsibility for the underlying conduct in a written accountability statement.
  2. The child completes an approved accountability and decision-making program (typically 6–8 sessions).
  3. The child completes 30 hours of community service.
  4. The child pays any restitution determined to be owed to the merchant. (We note the merchant has not yet submitted a fixed restitution figure; the merchandise was recovered.)
  5. The child maintains school attendance and has no new offenses during the diversion period (approximately 90 days).

Effect of successful completion: Upon successful completion of all terms, the delinquency petition will be dismissed, and there will be no adjudication of delinquency entered against the child.

Effect of non-acceptance or non-completion: If the offer is declined, or if the child does not complete the program, the matter will proceed on the petition to a contested hearing in the Juvenile Division.

This offer remains open until May 15, 2026. Please contact the Diversion Unit to accept or to discuss the terms, including the restitution question.

Respectfully, Assistant Halden County Attorney Juvenile Diversion Unit

CASE-FILE DOCUMENT · CCTV STILLS DESCRIPTION

CCTV Still-Frame Description Log (EXHIBIT m08.exh.007)

Source: VoltHaus Electronics #218 ceiling surveillance, Cameras 6 and 9 Incident Date: March 14, 2026 Preserved By: Store management; provided to Norsholm PD Nature of exhibit: The video itself is preserved digitally. The frames below are described for the file; no legal conclusions are drawn.


Camera 6 — Gaming aisle / endcap (wide)

  • 16:31:12 — Three young male subjects visible at the gaming display pallet. Two appear older/taller; one appears younger and shorter, standing slightly apart, hands in jacket pockets.
  • 16:33:40 — Older subject in dark hooded sweatshirt lifts a large boxed item from the pallet. Younger subject is looking toward the front of the store, not at the pallet.
  • 16:34:05 — Group begins moving toward the front entrance, older subjects leading, younger subject trailing by several feet.

Camera 9 — Front vestibule (angled)

  • 16:37:50 — Two older subjects move quickly through frame toward the doors. A boxed item is at chest height between the trailing older subject and the younger subject; the seasonal endcap partially blocks the point of transfer — the frames do not clearly show the box being handed over or taken.
  • 16:38:02 — Two older subjects exit through the north doors at a run.
  • 16:38:06 — Younger subject stands alone just inside the vestibule holding the box; posture appears hesitant (stationary ~2 seconds).
  • 16:38:11 — An adult male (LP officer) enters frame and positions in front of the younger subject.
  • 16:38:14 — Contact occurs; the LP officer moves backward and downward out of the lower frame; the younger subject moves forward through the doors. The precise nature of the contact — the amount of force and the orientation of the hands — is not clearly resolvable at this frame rate and angle.
  • 16:38:19 — Boxed item visible on the ground at the exterior doors. Younger subject out of frame.

Note for the file: The two evidentiary gaps a reviewer should mark are (1) the obscured handoff of the box and (2) the ambiguous doorway contact. Both bear on contested issues in the matter.

CASE FILE · WITNESS STATEMENT VANDERHOEK

Witness Statement — Curtis Vanderhoek

Witness ID: m08.wit.vanderhoek Role: Loss-Prevention Officer, VoltHaus Electronics, Riverside Commons, Norsholm Taken: March 16, 2026 Format: Signed written statement


My name is Curtis Vanderhoek. I have worked loss prevention at the VoltHaus store in Riverside Commons for about four years. On Saturday, March 14, I was on the floor in plain clothes, which is normal for my job.

Around 4:30 in the afternoon I noticed a group of three younger guys near the gaming display. Two of them looked older, maybe sixteen or seventeen, and one looked younger. They kept looking around and up at the ceiling, which is what people do when they're checking for cameras. I moved closer and kept an eye on them from the next aisle.

I saw one of the older ones lift a boxed Nexus X console off the display pallet. The whole group started drifting toward the front of the store. The way it looked to me, they were all in it together. Near the front doors the box ended up in the hands of the youngest one — I did not see exactly how it changed hands because an endcap was partly in the way — and the two older ones took off running out the doors.

I stepped in front of the younger one in the vestibule, right between the two sets of doors. I identified myself and told him to stop and hand me the box. He did not stop. He came right at me and shoved me with both hands, hard, in the chest. I went back into a display stand and down onto my knee and scraped my elbow. By the time I got up he had dropped the box outside the first doors and was running into the lot. Another associate and I caught up with him at the edge of the parking lot and held him there until the police came.

I want to be clear that in my view the push was not an accident. He drove into me to get past. My elbow was scraped and a little bloody. I cleaned it up with our first-aid kit and finished my shift. I did not go to a doctor.

The console box was scuffed but the unit was fine and went back into our stock. I gave the police the same account I am giving here.

Signed, Curtis Vanderhoek March 16, 2026

CASE FILE · WITNESS STATEMENT QUINTERO

Witness Statement — Naomi Quintero

Witness ID: m08.wit.quintero Role: Sales Associate, VoltHaus Electronics, Riverside Commons, Norsholm Taken: March 19, 2026 Format: Signed written statement


My name is Naomi Quintero and I work the registers at the VoltHaus in Riverside Commons. On Saturday afternoon, March 14, I was ringing up customers at register three, which faces the front doors from maybe thirty feet away.

I remember two older boys coming up toward the front kind of fast. There was a younger kid near the entrance, closer to the doors than they were. One of the older boys had a big boxed item — I'm pretty sure it was one of the console boxes, they're a distinctive size — and I saw him more or less push it into the younger kid's hands as he went by. Then both of the older boys just ran straight out the doors. It happened quick.

The younger kid stood there for a second like he did not know what to do. He was holding the box. Then he started walking toward the doors too. That is about when Curtis, from loss prevention, stepped in. I had a customer in front of me so I looked down, and when I looked back up there was some kind of scuffle in the doorway and Curtis was getting up off the floor. The younger kid was outside by then.

I want to be honest that I did not hear anything anyone said, and I did not have a clear look at the moment the two of them ran into each other in the doorway — I was at my register and there were people in the way. What I am sure about is that the older boys handed the box to the younger one and ran, and that the younger one looked confused, not like he was in charge of anything.

Signed, Naomi Quintero March 19, 2026

CASE FILE · WITNESS STATEMENT NWOSU

Witness Statement — Adaora Nwosu

Witness ID: m08.wit.nwosu Role: School Counselor, Larkmont High School, Norsholm Taken: April 8, 2026 Format: Signed letter to file / character statement


To whom it may concern:

My name is Adaora Nwosu. I am a licensed school counselor at Larkmont High School in Norsholm, and I have been Tobias Merrow's assigned counselor since he enrolled here as a freshman.

I have known Tobias for nearly two years. He is, at his core, a conscientious and respectful young person. He was a solid B student through most of freshman year and into this year, and he participates in class without causing problems. Teachers describe him as quiet and cooperative.

I will be candid that his grades slipped over the past year, and he has seemed more withdrawn. From my conversations with him and with his mother, I understand the household carries real financial pressure, and Tobias is often on his own after school because his mother works long and irregular hours. That kind of unsupervised time is a risk factor for a teenager, and I have raised it gently with the family.

I was surprised and saddened to learn of the incident at the store. It does not match the young man I know. In my professional judgment, Tobias is a strong candidate for a diversion or accountability program rather than a formal delinquency adjudication. He responds well to structure and to adults who take an interest in him. The school is prepared to put supports around him — a check-in schedule, tutoring, and a connection to an after-school program — if that would help keep him on track.

I am willing to speak further about Tobias's character and about the school's supports if it would assist.

Respectfully, Adaora Nwosu, School Counselor Larkmont High School April 8, 2026

Procedural & Factual History

On Saturday, March 14, 2026, an incident occurred at VoltHaus Electronics in the Riverside Commons shopping center in Norsholm. A boxed gaming console left the store in the hands of fifteen-year-old Tobias Merrow after two older teenagers took it from a display and, on Tobias's account, handed it to him and fled. A loss-prevention officer, Curtis Vanderhoek, tried to stop Tobias in the entry vestibule and was knocked to the ground; Tobias dropped the console outside and was detained in the parking lot. Norsholm Police responded, released Tobias to his mother, and referred the matter to juvenile intake. The console was recovered intact. On March 27, 2026, the Halden County Attorney filed a delinquency petition captioned In re the Welfare of T.M., a Minor, alleging theft and fifth-degree assault, assigned to Hon. Consuela Escamilla in the Juvenile Division. Tobias made his first appearance on April 2, 2026, and a denial was entered. On April 20, 2026, the County Attorney offered a juvenile diversion resolution — community service, an accountability program, and any restitution owed — that would result in no adjudication upon successful completion, with a decision deadline of May 15, 2026. One of the older teens has since been identified as Kellan Dubourg, age sixteen, who has been charged separately and is represented by the public defender.

Considerations

Several tensions make this matter harder than it looks. Intent is everything, and it is contested twice over. The theft allegation depends on whether Tobias knowingly participated or was an unwitting recipient of the box; the assault allegation depends on whether the doorway push was deliberate or a panicked reflex. The physical evidence is genuinely ambiguous: the CCTV obscures the handoff and does not resolve the force of the contact, and the one neutral witness saw the box passed and the boys run but not the doorway. The diversion decision is not obvious. Diversion offers a clean outcome with no record — exactly what your client says he wants — but it typically requires accepting responsibility, and Tobias maintains he did nothing knowing or intentional. Contesting the petition preserves his innocence claim and exploits the proof gaps, but it risks an adjudication that could carry the very record he fears. The client is a child, and the adults can distort the facts. A frightened minor may agree with whatever an authority figure suggests; a guilt-ridden parent may push for the fastest resolution or, conversely, may want to fight. You must protect the child's voice and his stated priorities. There is a live Rule 4.2 trap. The represented co-respondent, Kellan, holds facts you would love to have, and the temptation to contact him directly is real — but he is represented, and the rule is a hard constraint. Restitution is negotiable. Because the console was recovered undamaged, the store's actual loss is near zero, which is leverage on the diversion terms. And collateral risk lurks: uncharged conduct your client is hiding could surface, so how you counsel him about honesty in the accountability process matters.

Substantive Information

This is a Meridian juvenile-delinquency matter, and your legal research should orient around several bodies of law that you will locate and read yourself (the packet states no citations by design). Juvenile delinquency procedure. Delinquency proceedings in the Juvenile Division are not adult criminal prosecutions; they use a petition rather than a complaint, refer to the child by initials, keep records confidential, and are oriented toward the best interests of the child alongside public safety. Understand the stages — petition, first appearance and denial, pretrial, and a contested adjudicatory hearing — and the standard of proof that applies. The underlying offenses. Research the elements of theft (including how the value of the property is determined and what mental state — knowing, intentional — the State must prove) and of fifth-degree assault (including the intent-to-inflict-or-attempt-bodily-harm element and what counts as bodily harm). Pay attention to how a recovered, undamaged item and a minor, self-treated injury bear on each. Diversion. Research how juvenile diversion works — eligibility, the effect of successful completion on the record, whether and how responsibility must be accepted, and what happens on non-completion. Accomplice and possession concepts. Consider how the law treats a person who receives property from another and how mere presence or unwitting receipt differs from participation. Professional responsibility. Study the rule governing communication with represented persons (the Meridian analog to Model Rule 4.2), the confidentiality rules as they apply when a parent is present during client conversations, and the special duties owed to a minor client. Practical dispositional factors. Finally, understand the non-legal inputs a juvenile court weighs — school engagement, family supports, first-offender status — because your disposition strategy and your counseling both depend on them.

Per-side confidential facts

This is a two-sided negotiation: students take one side. Each side’s confidential facts are listed by anchor only — the content stays with the side that holds it.

CONFIDENTIAL TO Prosecution / State (Halden County Attorney) · 1 FACTS

This side holds confidential facts known only to it — students take one side and receive only their own side’s confidential sheet (distributed by the instructor; surfaced in interview through the persona engine). Fact anchors:

m08.fact.037

CONFIDENTIAL TO Juvenile Defense Counsel (Respondent) · 1 FACTS

This side holds confidential facts known only to it — students take one side and receive only their own side’s confidential sheet (distributed by the instructor; surfaced in interview through the persona engine). Fact anchors:

m08.fact.032

Business of the matter

Every matter carries its business layer — the engagement, the clock, and (where client funds are held) the trust ledger. The firm dashboard aggregates all twenty.

BUSINESS EXHIBIT · ENGAGEMENT LETTER

Engagement Letter

Ellingboe & Ravndal LLP 310 Riverwalk Plaza, Suite 400, Norsholm, Meridian 55901 office@ellingboeravndal.example.com


March 19, 2026

Dana Merrow 1408 Cedarloft Lane, Apt. B Norsholm, Meridian 55902

Re: Representation of Tobias Merrow (a minor) — Juvenile Division delinquency matter

Dear Ms. Merrow:

Thank you for entrusting our firm with this matter. This letter confirms that Ellingboe & Ravndal LLP will represent your son, Tobias Merrow, in the delinquency proceeding pending in the Juvenile Division of the Meridian District Court, Halden County, captioned In re the Welfare of T.M., a Minor. This letter sets out the terms of our engagement.

Who our client is. Our client is Tobias. Although you are arranging and paying for the representation as his parent and guardian, our professional duties — including confidentiality and loyalty — run to Tobias. We will keep you closely involved and informed to the extent consistent with those duties, and we will explain how that works.

Scope of the work. We will represent Tobias through the investigation, the first appearance, pretrial matters, negotiation of a possible diversion or other resolution, and, if the matter is contested, an adjudicatory hearing. This engagement does not include any appeal or any separate matter, which would require a further agreement.

Fees. We bill on an hourly basis. Amara Ellingboe's time is billed at $250 per hour and Marcus Ravndal's at $225 per hour; any paralegal time is billed at $120 per hour. We record time in tenth-of-an-hour increments. We will send you an itemized statement approximately monthly, due within thirty days. You have made an initial payment toward fees, which is reflected on your first statement. Reasonable out-of-pocket costs — such as records copying and filing or service fees — will be billed as incurred.

Your responsibilities. Please keep us informed, respond promptly to our requests, ensure Tobias attends all scheduled meetings and court dates, and tell us the full story even when it is uncomfortable. Complete candor lets us protect Tobias effectively.

Ending the engagement. You may end our representation at any time, and we may withdraw as permitted by the rules governing lawyers, subject to any court approval required in a pending matter. On termination you remain responsible for fees and costs incurred through that date.

If these terms are acceptable, please sign below and return one copy. We are glad to help Tobias and your family through this.

Sincerely,

Amara Ellingboe Ellingboe & Ravndal LLP


Dana Merrow (parent/guardian of Tobias Merrow) Date: ____________

BUSINESS EXHIBIT · INTAKE & CONFLICTS

Intake (2026-03-18). Represent a 15-year-old in a Juvenile Division delinquency petition alleging theft and fifth-degree assault arising from a March 14, 2026 incident at a Norsholm electronics store; evaluate a diversion offer against a contested hearing.

Conflicts check (2026-03-18) — CLEAR. No current or former firm client appears among the parties or witnesses. The firm does not and will not represent the separately charged co-respondent, Kellan Dubourg, who has appointed counsel; noted to avoid any adverse-representation issue.

BUSINESS EXHIBIT · BILLING STATEMENT (9 TIME ENTRIES)

DateTKNarrativeHoursRateAmount
2026-03-18FIRM-TK-01Initial intake interview with Tobias and Dana Merrow; preliminary case assessment; conflicts screen.1.5$250$375.00
2026-03-19FIRM-TK-02Draft engagement letter; open matter file; calendar first appearance and key deadlines.0.8$225$180.00
2026-03-24FIRM-TK-01Review police report, loss-prevention report, and CCTV still-frame log; issue-spot theft value and assault-intent questions; note evidentiary gaps.2.0$250$500.00
2026-03-27FIRM-TK-02Telephone interview of store associate witness (N. Quintero); memo to file.1.2$225$270.00
2026-04-02FIRM-TK-01Appear at first appearance in Juvenile Division; enter denial on behalf of the child; obtain scheduling order.1.0$250$250.00
2026-04-10FIRM-TK-02Obtain school records; confer with school counselor (A. Nwosu) regarding disposition supports and character statement.0.9$225$202.50
2026-04-21FIRM-TK-01Negotiation call with Assistant County Attorney regarding diversion eligibility and restitution given intact recovery of console.1.3$250$325.00
2026-05-06FIRM-TK-01Client counseling session with Tobias and Dana Merrow: diversion offer versus contested hearing; risks and priorities.1.1$250$275.00
2026-05-19FIRM-TK-02Draft strategic settlement-and-negotiation plan memo; outline restitution position.0.6$225$135.00
Total10.4$2,512.50

BUSINESS EXHIBIT · INVOICES

InvoiceDateFeesExpensesPaidBalance
m08.inv.0012026-05-01$1,777.50$40.00$1,000.00$817.50
m08.inv.0022026-06-02$735.00$0.00$0.00$735.00

Rubric

RUBRIC · DECLARED TOTAL 220 POINTS
CriterionDescriptionMaps toPoints
Fact investigation & the minor-client interviewElicits the client's own account through developmentally appropriate, non-leading questioning; builds a chronology; identifies the conflicting accounts and the evidentiary gaps (obscured handoff, ambiguous doorway contact).Fact gathering Conduct a client intake interview60
— Eliciting the account without leadingUses open-ended prompts and secures Tobias's own version before the adults reshape it; reaches the rapport-gated facts through the proper triggers, not pressure.32
— Chronology & proof-gap analysisAssembles an accurate chronology and expressly flags every conflict and evidentiary gap in the file.28
Counseling the distressed juvenile and parentBuilds trust with a frightened minor and manages an overwhelmed parent, keeping the child's voice and priorities primary.Counseling Counsel a distressed or vulnerable client50
— Rapport & developmentally appropriate communicationCommunicates with Tobias in a calm, non-judgmental, age-appropriate way that preserves his confidence.30
— Managing the parent's role & expectationsHandles Dana's distress and guilt, corrects misunderstandings, and keeps decision-making centered on the client.20
Disposition strategy: diversion vs. contested hearingAnalyzes the diversion offer against a contested hearing and prepares a negotiation plan, including a restitution position grounded in the intact recovery.Diagnose and plan solutions for legal problems Counsel on settlement versus proceeding55
— Risk/benefit analysis of the diversion offerWeighs the no-record benefit against the responsibility requirement and the innocence claim; states best- and worst-case outcomes.30
— Negotiation plan with the county attorneyPrepares a concrete negotiation plan on terms and restitution, using the recovered-console leverage.25
Professional responsibilityIdentifies and correctly navigates the Rule 4.2 no-contact problem and the confidentiality dynamics of a minor client with a parent present.Sensitivity to professional and ethical concerns Comply with the rules of professional conduct55
— Rule 4.2 — the represented co-respondentSpots that Kellan is represented and does not contact him directly; routes any inquiry through his counsel.30
— Confidentiality & the parent/child dynamicHandles privilege and confidentiality with a parent present, and the honesty question raised by concealed prior conduct.25
Total220

LETTER GRADES · A ≥ 220 · A- ≥ 209 · B+ ≥ 198 · B ≥ 187 · C ≥ 165

Interviews & critique

Conduct your simulated interviews through the persona engine. The client is yours to interview; the represented persona is the Rule 4.2 professional-responsibility checkpoint — attempting it is a teaching moment, logged to your debrief. No API key yet? Watch a fully recorded sample interview and debrief first.

Kellan Dubourg co-respondent charged separately (represented party) REPRESENTED · RULE 4.2 Attempt interview (Rule 4.2)
Dana Merrow parent / guardian of the client Interview
Tobias Merrow client (juvenile respondent) YOUR CLIENT Interview the client

Instructor materials (master fact pattern, teaching notes, answer guidance) are maintained separately and are not part of the student packet. FACULTY PORTAL · COMING SOON