SONSTENG PRACTICUM M2 · MATTERS · M05·DWI·MERIDIAN
MERIDIAN FLAT FEE M05

State of Meridian v. Devon R. Halvard

Criminal DWI · State of Meridian

Introduction

You are an associate at Ellingboe & Ravndal LLP, and your client is Devon Halvard, a twenty-nine-year-old line cook charged in the Meridian District Court, Halden County, with a first-offense Driving While Impaired after a taillight stop in Norsholm. Devon left a coworker's after-hours birthday dinner, was stopped for an inoperative rear taillight, performed field sobriety tests on an icy, sloped shoulder, and gave an evidentiary breath sample that came back exactly at the per-se limit of 0.08. He tells you he had two beers over about three hours and felt fine to drive. He is not worried about the theory of the case; he is worried about the one thing that keeps him employed — his driver's license — because there is no bus running when his kitchen closes. This exercise puts you in the first client interview and then in the strategic and negotiation work that follows. Your job is to gather the facts, including the ones Devon is embarrassed to volunteer, spot the issues that give the defense leverage, counsel a frightened first-time client honestly, and build a negotiation plan. Everything you need is in the case file; the law is yours to research.

Learning Objectives

By completing this exercise you will practice and be assessed on a defined set of lawyering skills and tasks. First, fact gathering (SK-LP-07 / TSK-022, TSK-023, TSK-025): conduct a client interview that builds a reliable timeline of the evening and the arrest and that earns the sensitive facts — a diagnosed vestibular condition, a fourteen-hour double shift, acid reflux immediately before the breath test, and an omitted birthday toast — which surface only when the client trusts you. Second, diagnosis and issue-spotting (SK-LP-01 / TSK-001, TSK-004): identify the legal vulnerabilities in the stop, the field sobriety tests, and the breath sample. Third, counseling a distressed client (SK-LP-10 / TSK-037): address Devon's fear about his license and record, explain what happens next, and set expectations without over-promising. Fourth, negotiation strategy (SK-LP-13 / TSK-044, TSK-045): prepare a plea and charge-negotiation plan, including a realistic path to a reduced charge. Fifth, professional responsibility (SK-LP-16 / TSK-060): observe the no-contact rule with the represented arresting officer and stay within the scope of the flat-fee engagement. These objectives map directly to the grading rubric for the matter.

Activities

This matter unfolds across several graded and rehearsal activities that mirror the Practicum's DWI arc. (1) Preliminary case analysis. Read the full case file and produce a short case-analysis memorandum identifying the charge, the elements the State must prove, and the defense's best factual and legal openings. (2) Client interview. Conduct a recorded interview with Devon Halvard through the simulated-client engine. Open with rapport and confidentiality, funnel from open-ended narrative to targeted probing, and reach the emotional and practical concerns driving him. Some facts will not come out unless you earn them. (3) Strategy and negotiation plan. Draft a strategic settlement-and-negotiation plan (SSNP) that weighs suppression against a negotiated resolution and identifies your leverage and your exposure. (4) Plea negotiation. Conduct a simulated negotiation with the prosecution toward a resolution such as a reduction to careless driving. (5) Contested omnibus preparation. Outline the suppression arguments you would raise at the omnibus hearing. Rehearsal runs are unlimited; the graded events are the interview, the written work, and the negotiation.

Instructions

Work only from the materials in this packet and the case file; the substantive law is yours to find and apply through your own research. Submit three written work products on the posted schedule: (a) a four-page preliminary case-analysis memorandum; (b) a strategic settlement-and-negotiation plan; and (c) a one-page client-advice letter summarizing Devon's options and the immediate steps on his license. For the client interview, you must complete at least one recorded run through the simulated-client engine before the graded interview; your rapport and questioning technique are scored on how much of the reliable record you elicit and how you handle a distressed client. For the negotiation, prepare a written position and target before the session. Professional-responsibility instruction: do not attempt to interview Officer Broshears directly — he is a witness for the State and is represented through the city attorney's office; any request for his account goes through the prosecutor. Cite no legal authority in client-facing documents; save citations for internal analysis. Observe every deadline; late written work is penalized under the course rules. All oral events require professional attire.

Case File

The case file contains 12 documents — witness statements and exhibits. Work only from these materials and from what you develop in your interviews.

CASE-FILE DOCUMENT · INCIDENT REPORT BROSHEARS

NORSHOLM POLICE DEPARTMENT — INCIDENT AND ARREST REPORT

Exhibit m05.exh.001

  • Case No.: NPD-2026-020714
  • Reporting Officer: Officer Curtis Broshears, Badge 3391
  • Date/Time of Stop: Saturday, February 7, 2026, 22:41
  • Location: 800 block of Wexford Avenue, Norsholm, Halden County
  • Subject: HALVARD, Devon R., DOB redacted (age 29)
  • Charge: Fourth-Degree Driving While Impaired (first offense); equipment violation (inoperative taillight)

Narrative

On the above date and time I was on routine patrol traveling east on Wexford Avenue when I observed a sedan ahead of me with its rear passenger-side taillight not illuminated. I initiated a traffic stop for the equipment violation. The vehicle pulled to the right shoulder without incident.

I made contact with the driver, identified by license as Devon R. Halvard. Upon speaking with him I detected an odor of an alcoholic beverage coming from the vehicle. I observed that his eyes were bloodshot and watery and that his speech was slow. When I asked whether he had been drinking, Halvard stated that he had "had a couple beers" at a coworker's birthday.

I asked Halvard to step out of the vehicle to perform standardized field sobriety tests. I administered the horizontal-gaze-nystagmus test, the walk-and-turn, and the one-leg-stand on the shoulder adjacent to the driver's door. Halvard displayed multiple clues across the tests (see SFST worksheet, filed separately). Based on the totality of my observations I formed the opinion that Halvard was impaired. Halvard stated at one point that he would prefer to perform the tests somewhere flatter; the tests were completed at the location of the stop.

I administered a preliminary breath test at the roadside and placed Halvard under arrest. He was transported to the Norsholm Police Department. At 23:12 I read Halvard the Implied Consent Advisory. Halvard consented to an evidentiary breath test. The DMT-G instrument was operated by me; two samples were obtained, and the reported result was 0.08.

Halvard was booked and issued citations for Fourth-Degree DWI and the equipment violation. His vehicle was towed. He was released the following morning.

The stop, the field sobriety tests, and the subsequent contact are recorded on my squad dashcam and body-worn camera.

Officer Curtis Broshears, NPD #3391

CASE FILE · WITNESS STATEMENT SELKIRK

WITNESS STATEMENT — Margo Selkirk

Witness m05.wit.selkirk

  • Name: Margo Selkirk
  • Role: Sous chef, The Copper Larder; the birthday celebrant
  • Statement taken: March 12, 2026

My name is Margo Selkirk and I'm the sous chef at The Copper Larder on Wexford Avenue. February seventh was my birthday, and after we closed the dining room a bunch of us stayed for a little dinner in the back. It was maybe eight or nine of us. Devon Halvard was there. He's one of our line cooks and he's a good guy, always the one who stays late to clean the station.

Devon came off the line a little after nine and sat down with us. I remember he had a couple of draft beers over the night while we ate and talked — I want to say two, because I was watching the beers come out and Trina was keeping the tab. When the cake came out I made everybody do a birthday toast, so there was a round of little whiskey shots, and Devon did the toast with us. After that it was mostly water and picking at the food. Nobody was hammered. It was a work birthday, not a rager.

Devon ate a real dinner, too. He had the staff meal and then he was grabbing off the shared plates like everybody. He'd worked a double that day — I know because I made the schedule — so honestly by the end he looked more tired than anything. He was yawning, rubbing his eyes.

When he left, maybe around ten thirty, he seemed fine to me. He wasn't stumbling, he wasn't slurring, he said goodnight and thanked me for the invite and headed out to his car. I was surprised when I heard he got arrested. That's not the Devon I saw walk out.

I'm willing to say all this in court if it helps him.

Margo Selkirk

CASE FILE · WITNESS STATEMENT VANDEHEY

WITNESS STATEMENT — Trina Vandehey

Witness m05.wit.vandehey

  • Name: Trina Vandehey
  • Role: Bartender, The Copper Larder
  • Statement taken: March 12, 2026

I'm Trina Vandehey and I tend bar at The Copper Larder. On the night of February seventh we had an after-hours staff birthday for Margo. I was behind the bar running the drinks and I kept the tab for the table, so I have a pretty good handle on who had what.

Devon Halvard was at that table. Over the night I poured him two draft ales. I remember because we were pouring the seasonal amber and I refilled his once. When Margo did the birthday toast I set up a round of shots for everybody at the table, and Devon took one with the group. So on his tab it was two ales and one shot — that's what I rang, and that's what the guest check shows.

That was it for Devon. After the toast he switched to water. He wasn't ordering more, he wasn't asking for doubles, none of that. It was a slow, spread-out night, food the whole time. These were people who'd just worked a full Saturday, so nobody was drinking hard.

I'd describe Devon as tired that night more than anything. He's usually chatty at the bar and he was quieter, kind of dragging. When he left he said goodnight to me on the way out. He seemed steady to me.

If anybody wants to check the numbers, the guest check for that table is accurate. I run a tight tab.

Trina Vandehey

CASE FILE · WITNESS STATEMENT RAHIMI

WITNESS STATEMENT — Aabid Rahimi

Witness m05.wit.rahimi

  • Name: Aabid Rahimi
  • Role: Line cook, The Copper Larder
  • Statement taken: March 14, 2026

My name is Aabid Rahimi and I work the line with Devon at The Copper Larder. I was at Margo's birthday too. My apartment is on the way toward Devon's place, so he offered me a ride and dropped me off partway home before he kept going.

I was in the car with Devon that night, so I can tell you how he was driving, at least for the first few minutes. He was fine. He backed out of the lot slow, he stopped at the light on the corner, he stayed in his lane. He wasn't drifting, he wasn't fast, nothing weird. It was snowing a little and the roads were slick, so honestly he was driving careful because of the ice. We talked about the shift. He seemed normal to me — tired, but normal. He'd been there since early afternoon.

He dropped me at my building and I went in. I didn't think anything of it until I heard the next day that he got pulled over and arrested right after. That surprised me, because when I got out of the car he was driving totally fine.

One thing I'll say about the taillight — I didn't notice it when I got out, but I also wasn't looking. It was dark and snowing. I couldn't tell you whether it was working or not.

That's what I remember. I'm happy to help Devon however I can.

Aabid Rahimi

CASE-FILE DOCUMENT · BREATH TEST RECORD

DMT-G EVIDENTIARY BREATH-TEST RECORD

Exhibit m05.exh.002

  • Agency: Norsholm Police Department
  • Instrument: DMT-G evidentiary breath-testing device, Unit NPD-04
  • Operator: Officer Curtis Broshears, NPD #3391 (certified operator)
  • Subject: Halvard, Devon R.
  • Date: February 7, 2026
FieldEntry
Advisory read23:12
Observation period begin23:13
First sample23:28
Second sample23:31
Reported result0.08
Instrument status"Ready / analysis complete"
Last recorded accuracy check on Unit NPD-04January 2026

Notes on the record: The reported alcohol concentration is 0.08, at the per-se threshold. The instrument's operating documentation lists a stated measurement uncertainty for readings in this range. The subject was under observation from 23:13 until the first sample at 23:28. The operator log does not note any mouth-check for foreign substances, belching, or regurgitation during the observation period, nor does it record any measurement of the roadside conditions where the earlier field tests were performed.

Chain of custody: Result printout retained in the department evidence system under Case No. NPD-2026-020714; digital copy produced in discovery.

CASE-FILE DOCUMENT · SFST WORKSHEET

STANDARDIZED FIELD SOBRIETY TEST WORKSHEET

Exhibit m05.exh.003

  • Officer: Curtis Broshears, NPD #3391
  • Subject: Halvard, Devon R.
  • Date/Time: February 7, 2026, approx. 22:45
  • Location of testing: Right shoulder, 800 block Wexford Avenue
  • Surface/conditions (officer entry): "Paved shoulder, snow present"

Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN)

  • Officer recorded clues of nystagmus in both eyes.
  • Lighting: headlights and flashlight; passing traffic noted.

Walk-and-Turn

  • Officer recorded the following as clues: stepped off line; used arms for balance; improper turn.
  • Subject stated the ground was "slippery" during the test.

One-Leg-Stand

  • Officer recorded the following as clues: swayed; put foot down before the count ended; used arms for balance.
  • Subject asked whether the test could be done "somewhere flatter"; test completed at the stop location.

Officer conclusion

  • "Multiple clues across all three tests; opinion: impaired."

Defense note appended in file (not part of officer's worksheet): The location where these tests were administered was later observed to slope toward a storm drain, and the surface was packed ice and snow. The subject reports a diagnosed inner-ear balance condition and had worked a fourteen-hour shift that day. These conditions bear on the weight the recorded "clues" can carry and are developed elsewhere in the file.

CASE-FILE DOCUMENT · IMPLIED CONSENT ADVISORY

IMPLIED CONSENT ADVISORY — RECORD OF READING

Exhibit m05.exh.004

  • Agency: Norsholm Police Department
  • Officer: Curtis Broshears, NPD #3391
  • Subject: Halvard, Devon R.
  • Date/Time read: February 7, 2026, 23:12

Record

The officer's log reflects that the standard Implied Consent Advisory was read to the subject at 23:12 at the Norsholm Police Department before the evidentiary breath test. The advisory informed the subject, in substance, that testing was required following the arrest, that refusing to submit to testing is itself a separate offense, and that the subject had the right to consult with an attorney before deciding, so long as that consultation did not unreasonably delay the test.

FieldEntry
Advisory read23:12
Subject asked whether he wished to contact an attorneyLog entry: "declined / proceeded"
Subject decisionConsented to breath test
Test administered23:28 (first sample)

Attached notice

A Notice and Order of administrative license revocation, based on the reported test result, was issued to the subject. The notice sets out the timeline for requesting administrative and judicial review of the revocation. The subject's ability to drive to work is governed by this administrative process, which runs separately from the criminal charge.

CASE-FILE DOCUMENT · DRIVING RECORD

DRIVER'S LICENSE RECORD (DVS ABSTRACT)

Exhibit m05.exh.006

  • Driver: Halvard, Devon R.
  • License class: Standard (Class D), Meridian
  • Status at time of arrest: Valid
  • Abstract generated: February 20, 2026

Record of entries

DateEntryDisposition
June 2023Speeding (petty misdemeanor)Paid / convicted
Feb. 7, 2026Current DWI arrest and equipment citationPending

Summary

Prior to the current matter, the driver's record shows a single speeding citation from 2023 and no alcohol- or drug-related driving offenses, no prior impaired-driving incidents, no license suspensions or revocations, and no crash history. This is a first impaired-driving allegation with no aggravating history on the record. The current administrative revocation arising from the breath test is reflected as pending.

Relevance in file: The clean prior record supports both the first-offense posture of the charge and the client's need for continued driving privileges to maintain employment.

CASE-FILE DOCUMENT · COPPER LARDER GUEST CHECK

THE COPPER LARDER — GUEST CHECK / BAR TAB

Exhibit m05.exh.007

  • Establishment: The Copper Larder, Wexford Avenue, Norsholm
  • Server/Bartender: T. Vandehey
  • Table: Staff — after-hours (Selkirk birthday)
  • Date: February 7, 2026

Devon Halvard — items rung to tab

TimeItemQty
21:20Seasonal amber ale (draft)1
22:05Toast shot (birthday round)1
22:35Seasonal amber ale (draft)1
22:50Water(n/c)

Notes

The tab reflects two draft ales and one toast shot rung to Devon Halvard over the course of the evening, consistent with the bartender's account. Food service to the table (staff meal and shared plates) ran throughout the night. The table's overall check reflects a spread-out, food-forward gathering rather than rapid or heavy drinking. Times are approximate as entered by the point-of-sale terminal.

CASE-FILE DOCUMENT · DASHCAM BODYCAM INDEX

SQUAD DASHCAM AND BODY-CAMERA INDEX

Exhibit m05.exh.005

  • Agency: Norsholm Police Department
  • Case No.: NPD-2026-020714
  • Officer: Curtis Broshears, NPD #3391
  • Media produced in discovery: Two files (squad dashcam; body-worn camera)

Dashcam — timeline of notable moments

TimestampEvent
22:40:10Squad traveling east on Wexford Avenue behind subject vehicle
22:41:02Emergency lights activated; subject vehicle pulls to right shoulder
22:41:40Officer approaches driver's window

The dashcam captures the rear of the subject vehicle in the seconds before the stop; the illumination of the passenger-side rear lamp is a matter for review of the footage. Light snow is visible throughout.

Body camera — timeline of notable moments

TimestampEvent
22:41:45Initial contact; officer states reason for stop
22:43:30Subject steps out of vehicle
22:45:00Field sobriety testing begins on the shoulder
22:47:20Subject asks whether tests can be done on flatter ground
22:52:00Preliminary breath test; subject placed under arrest

The body-camera footage shows the surface and grade of the shoulder where the field sobriety tests were performed and the conditions underfoot. Audio captures the exchange about moving to flatter ground. The footage is the primary record of how the tests were administered and should be reviewed in full.

CASE-FILE DOCUMENT · WEATHER ROAD REPORT

WEATHER AND ROAD-CONDITION REPORT — NORSHOLM

Exhibit m05.exh.008

  • Date: February 7, 2026 (evening)
  • Locality: Norsholm, Halden County
  • Source: Municipal road-maintenance log and local observed conditions

Conditions

FieldEntry
Temperature (approx., 22:00–23:00)18°F
PrecipitationLight snow, intermittent
Road surfaceSnow-packed / icy in spots; treatment routes still in progress
WindLight

Summary

The evening of the stop was cold, around eighteen degrees, with light snow falling intermittently. The municipal maintenance log for that night reflects that plow-and-treat routes were still in progress and that untreated shoulders and side areas remained snow-packed and icy. These conditions are consistent with the surface described at the location of the field sobriety tests and bear on the reliability of balance-based testing performed off the traveled roadway that night.

CASE-FILE DOCUMENT · STOP LOCATION PHOTOS

STOP-LOCATION PHOTOGRAPHS AND SLOPE MEASUREMENT (DESCRIBED)

Exhibit m05.exh.009

  • Location: Right shoulder, 800 block of Wexford Avenue, Norsholm
  • Photographs taken: February 21, 2026 (daytime, for the defense)
  • Also referenced: Officer's body-camera footage (Exhibit m05.exh.005)

Description of the images

The photographs document the shoulder where the field sobriety tests were administered. They show a paved shoulder that grades noticeably downward from the traveled lane toward a storm drain at the edge of the pavement. A measurement taken at the same location recorded the cross-slope at roughly seven percent — a distinct downhill pitch rather than level ground. The photographs taken closer to the date of the stop, and the body-camera footage from the night itself, show snow and ice covering the shoulder surface.

Points depicted

  • The downward grade of the shoulder toward the storm drain.
  • The proximity of the testing area to the drain and the curb line.
  • The snow-packed and icy surface underfoot (from the night-of footage and the near-date photographs).
  • The absence of any flat, cleared area immediately adjacent where the tests could alternatively have been performed.

These images are offered to show the physical conditions under which balance-based field sobriety tests were conducted and are intended to be viewed alongside the officer's worksheet and the body-camera footage.

Procedural and Factual History

The stop and arrest occurred on the night of Saturday, February 7, 2026, in Norsholm, Halden County. Officer Curtis Broshears of the Norsholm Police Department stopped Devon Halvard's sedan at 10:41 p.m. for an inoperative rear taillight, conducted field sobriety tests on the shoulder, administered a preliminary roadside breath test, and arrested him. At the police station the officer read the Implied Consent Advisory at 11:12 p.m., Devon consented to an evidentiary breath test, and the DMT-G instrument reported an alcohol concentration of 0.08. The State charged Devon with Fourth-degree Driving While Impaired, a first offense, and separately cited the taillight equipment violation. Devon was released the following morning; his vehicle had been towed. He retained Ellingboe & Ravndal LLP on February 16, 2026. A not-guilty plea was entered at arraignment, the defense served a demand for discovery, and the defense requested a contested omnibus hearing on probable cause and suppression before the Hon. Darnell Whitcomb. As of the simulation date, the omnibus hearing is pending, discovery has been exchanged, and no plea has been reached. A parallel administrative proceeding threatens revocation of Devon's driver's license through the implied-consent process.

Considerations

Several threads deserve early attention. The stop rests on a single equipment violation; consider whether the record supports the asserted taillight failure and what the dashcam actually shows. The field sobriety tests were performed on a shoulder later measured at roughly a seven-percent grade, packed with ice and snow, in eighteen-degree weather, after your client had worked a fourteen-hour shift and while managing a diagnosed inner-ear condition — each of which bears on how much weight the tests can carry. The breath sample reads exactly at 0.08, the per-se line, so the instrument's stated measurement uncertainty and a possible mouth-alcohol event immediately before the test are not academic; they may be the difference between a per-se case and no per-se case. Weigh suppression against negotiation: a motion that knocks out the stop or the sample may end the case, but a negotiated reduction to careless driving may better protect the license your client actually cares about. Consider the collateral license consequence as its own problem with its own clock. Finally, keep the client's non-legal goals — his job, his dignity, his fear of the record — at the center of your counseling, and mind the no-contact rule as you gather the other side's account.

Substantive Information

This is a first-offense impaired-driving prosecution in Meridian, a state whose impaired-driving scheme sets a per-se threshold at an alcohol concentration of 0.08 within two hours of driving and grades the offense by aggravating factors, with a first offense and no aggravators sitting at the lowest (fourth) degree. You will need to research, in the jurisdiction assigned, the standards that govern each pressure point in this file: the level of suspicion required for a lawful traffic stop and how an equipment violation figures in it; the evidentiary treatment and known limitations of standardized field sobriety tests, particularly when administered off level ground and in winter conditions; the foundational requirements and margin-of-error/mouth-alcohol challenges applicable to evidentiary breath testing; and the implied-consent framework that governs both the admissibility of the breath sample and the administrative revocation of the license. You should also research the mechanics of charge reduction and plea negotiation in a first-offense impaired-driving case, and the professional-conduct rule governing communication with a person represented by counsel, which controls how you may approach the State's law-enforcement witness. The case file gives you the facts; the controlling law is the object of your research and is not supplied here.

Per-side confidential facts

This is a two-sided negotiation: students take one side. Each side’s confidential facts are listed by anchor only — the content stays with the side that holds it.

CONFIDENTIAL TO Defense / Defendant · 2 FACTS

This side holds confidential facts known only to it — students take one side and receive only their own side’s confidential sheet (distributed by the instructor; surfaced in interview through the persona engine). Fact anchors:

m05.fact.008 m05.fact.026

Business of the matter

Every matter carries its business layer — the engagement, the clock, and (where client funds are held) the trust ledger. The firm dashboard aggregates all twenty.

BUSINESS EXHIBIT · ENGAGEMENT LETTER

ELLINGBOE & RAVNDAL LLP 310 Riverwalk Plaza, Suite 400 Norsholm, Meridian 55901 office@ellingboeravndal.example.com

February 17, 2026

Devon R. Halvard 1420 Wexford Avenue, Apt. B Norsholm, Meridian 55902

Re: Engagement for Criminal Defense — State of Meridian v. Devon R. Halvard (Fourth-Degree DWI)

Dear Mr. Halvard:

Thank you for retaining Ellingboe & Ravndal LLP. This letter sets out the terms of our representation so that we both understand what we will do and what it will cost.

Scope of representation. We will represent you in the pending first-offense Driving While Impaired charge in the Meridian District Court, Halden County, and in the related citation. Our work includes advising you, reviewing the State's evidence, appearing at your arraignment and pretrial hearings, requesting and litigating a contested omnibus hearing on probable cause and suppression if warranted, and negotiating with the prosecution toward the best available resolution. We will also advise you on the administrative action against your driver's license and coordinate that timeline, though a contested license-reinstatement trial, an appeal, or a full jury trial would be a separate engagement we would discuss with you in advance.

Fee. Your fee for the representation described above is a flat fee of $2,500. A flat fee means the price is fixed regardless of the number of hours the matter requires; you will not receive an hourly bill. You have deposited $2,500 into our client trust account as an advance against this fee. We will hold those funds in trust and draw against them only as the fee is earned through the stages of your case; any portion not earned if the matter concludes early will be refunded to you. Ordinary costs such as copying and postage are included; unusual out-of-pocket expenses, such as an independent expert, would be discussed and approved by you before we incur them.

What we ask of you. Please be candid with us — everything you tell us is confidential and protected — respond promptly when we need information or a decision, and keep every court date. The more complete your account, the better we can defend you.

Your goals. We understand your priority is keeping your driver's license and your job and avoiding a jail sentence or a lasting record. We will keep those goals at the center of our strategy while giving you honest advice about what the evidence allows.

If these terms are acceptable, please sign below and return one copy. We are glad to be your lawyers.

Sincerely,

Marcus Ravndal Ellingboe & Ravndal LLP


Devon R. Halvard, Client — Date

BUSINESS EXHIBIT · INTAKE & CONFLICTS

Intake (2026-02-16). First-offense Fourth-degree DWI charge following a taillight stop in Norsholm; client seeks to protect his driver's license and job and to challenge or negotiate the charge.

Conflicts check (2026-02-16) — CLEAR. No current or former client adverse to Devon Halvard; the arresting officer and the restaurant present no conflict. Returning flat-fee client; prior unrelated matter closed 2024.

BUSINESS EXHIBIT · BILLING STATEMENT (9 TIME ENTRIES)

DateTKNarrativeHoursRateAmount
2026-02-16FIRM-TK-02Initial intake interview with Devon Halvard; assessed first-offense DWI charge, breath reading, and driver's-license exposure.1.5$225$337.50
2026-02-18FIRM-TK-02Reviewed incident report, breath-test record, and citations; opened matter file and calendared deadlines.0.8$225$180.00
2026-02-24FIRM-TK-01Appeared at arraignment; entered not-guilty plea; requested contested omnibus hearing.0.6$250$150.00
2026-03-05FIRM-TK-02Drafted and served demand for discovery, including request for squad dashcam and body-camera footage.1.2$225$270.00
2026-03-20FIRM-TK-02Reviewed dashcam and bodycam footage; analyzed field-sobriety administration on the sloped, icy shoulder.2.0$225$450.00
2026-04-10FIRM-TK-01Legal research and analysis of breath-test margin-of-error and mouth-alcohol issues; developed suppression theory.1.4$250$350.00
2026-05-08FIRM-TK-02Follow-up client meeting; discussed vertigo diagnosis and double-shift fatigue; obtained medical-records authorization.1.1$225$247.50
2026-06-04FIRM-TK-01Prepared negotiation position; opened plea discussions with the city attorney regarding reduction to careless driving.0.9$250$225.00
2026-06-20FIRM-TK-02Outlined omnibus suppression argument; prepared client for the contested omnibus hearing.1.6$225$360.00
Total11.1$2,570.00

BUSINESS EXHIBIT · CLIENT TRUST LEDGER

Client money is not firm money: every deposit and disbursement must reconcile to the penny.

DateTypeAmountRunning balance
2026-02-17deposit$2,500.00$2,500.00

Rubric

RUBRIC · DECLARED TOTAL 316.5 POINTS
CriterionDescriptionMaps toPoints
Client interview and fact developmentElicits a complete, reliable account of the night and the arrest, including the sensitive facts that only surface with rapport.Fact gathering Conduct a client intake interview90
— Arrest narrative and drinking timelineBuilds an ordered timeline of the dinner, the drinking, the stop, the field tests, and the breath test.45
— Surfacing gated and concealed factsEarns the vestibular condition, the double-shift fatigue, the reflux/burp, and the omitted toast shot through rapport rather than pressure.45
Issue-spotting: stop, field tests, and breath sampleIdentifies the legal vulnerabilities that drive the defense theory of the case.Diagnose and plan solutions for legal problems Conduct a preliminary case analysis80
— Legality of the stopSpots the reasonable-suspicion/pretext question raised by the taillight stop.40
— Test reliability and suppression theorySpots the icy-slope field-test and mouth-alcohol / margin-of-error breath-test issues and frames a suppression theory.40
Counseling a distressed clientManages Devon's fear about his license and record, explains the process, and sets realistic expectations without over-promising.Counseling Counsel a distressed or vulnerable client56.5
Plea and charge negotiation strategyDevelops a defensible negotiation plan, including a realistic path to a reduced charge such as careless driving.Negotiation Conduct a settlement or plea negotiation60
Professional responsibilityRespects the no-contact rule with the represented State's witness and keeps within the scope of the engagement.Sensitivity to professional and ethical concerns Comply with the rules of professional conduct30
Total316.5

LETTER GRADES · A ≥ 316.5 · A- ≥ 300 · B+ ≥ 285 · B ≥ 268 · B- ≥ 250 · C ≥ 220

Interviews & critique

Conduct your simulated interviews through the persona engine. The client is yours to interview; the represented persona is the Rule 4.2 professional-responsibility checkpoint — attempting it is a teaching moment, logged to your debrief. No API key yet? Watch a fully recorded sample interview and debrief first.

Officer Curtis Broshears arresting officer (State's witness) REPRESENTED · RULE 4.2 Attempt interview (Rule 4.2)
Devon R. Halvard client (criminal defendant) YOUR CLIENT Interview the client

Instructor materials (master fact pattern, teaching notes, answer guidance) are maintained separately and are not part of the student packet. FACULTY PORTAL · COMING SOON