THE FACTS OF THE SCENARIO
Facts — Empire Provisions Corp. v. Ostervold Packing Co.
Every labelled fact below is the single source the pages are generated from. Change a value here and everything rendered from it follows on the next publish; passages that restate it in prose are found and drafted for review, never changed silently.
Empire Provisions Corp. v. Ostervold Packing Co.
2026-03-09
2026-06-30
Empire Provisions Corp.
New York specialty-food distributor sued by its contract packer, Ostervold Packing Co., in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Commercial Division, for the contract price (about $147,000) of three truckloads of packaged goods that Empire rejected as mislabeled and short-dated. UCC Article 2 dispute over conformity, rightful and timely rejection, acceptance (including a partial resale of one load), the seller's cure offer, and the seller's price-versus-damages remedy. Firm represents Empire as buyer's counsel and defendant.
2026-03-06
returning client (prior firm matter m27)
clear
No current or former representation of Ostervold Packing Co., Roland Ostervold, or Halvorsen Markets. Empire is a returning client (prior closed matter m27); no positional conflict identified. Retained consultant Sengupta and freight broker Mizrahi are Empire-side witnesses, not adverse.
2026-03-07
250
2026-03-09