SONSTENG PRACTICUM MATTER · FACTS

THE FACTS OF THE SCENARIO

Facts — In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Gregor A. Winterhalt, a Meridian Attorney

Every labelled fact below is the single source the pages are generated from. Change a value here and everything rendered from it follows on the next publish; passages that restate it in prose are found and drafted for review, never changed silently.

Caption restated in 4 passages (each needs its own edit)

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Gregor A. Winterhalt, a Meridian Attorney

Open date restated in 2 passages (each needs its own edit)

2025-11-10

As of date restated in 2 passages (each needs its own edit)

2026-06-30

Client name restated in 20 passages (each needs its own edit)

Gregor A. Winterhalt

Matter summary not yet mentioned in the prose

Defense of a solo practitioner in a disciplinary proceeding brought by the Meridian Office of Lawyer Conduct alleging commingling and delayed disbursement of client settlement funds, inadequate trust records, and failure to communicate with a second client.

Intake date restated in 2 passages (each needs its own edit)

2025-11-10

Referral source not yet mentioned in the prose

referral from the county bar association's lawyers-assistance contact

Result restated in 4 passages (each needs its own edit)

clear

Notes not yet mentioned in the prose

Winterhalt is the firm's client. No current or former firm client is adverse; neither Marchetti, Osei, nor their counsel has any prior relationship with Ellingboe & Ravndal. No conflict identified.

Checked date not yet mentioned in the prose

2025-11-12

Rate not yet mentioned in the prose

250

Engagement date restated in 2 passages (each needs its own edit)

2025-11-14

Adding a fact records it here first — it appears in the prose only through drafted mentions you approve.