SONSTENG PRACTICUM MATTER · FACTS

THE FACTS OF THE SCENARIO

Facts — Halden Regional Transit District v. Marceline Osgard and Meridian Alliance of Public Workers, Local 7 (Arbitration)

Every labelled fact below is the single source the pages are generated from. Change a value here and everything rendered from it follows on the next publish; passages that restate it in prose are found and drafted for review, never changed silently.

Caption not yet mentioned in the prose

Halden Regional Transit District v. Marceline Osgard and Meridian Alliance of Public Workers, Local 7 (Arbitration)

Open date restated in 3 passages (each needs its own edit)

2025-11-05

As of date restated in 1 passage (each needs its own edit)

2026-06-30

Client name restated in 25 passages (each needs its own edit)

Marceline Osgard

Matter summary not yet mentioned in the prose

Represent discharged transit mechanic and grievant in a final-and-binding labor arbitration challenging her discharge for alleged insubordination; grievance brought by MAPW Local 7 asserting the discharge lacked just cause and was retaliation for safety complaints.

Intake date not yet mentioned in the prose

2025-11-03

Referral source not yet mentioned in the prose

union business agent referral

Result restated in 19 passages (each needs its own edit)

clear

Notes not yet mentioned in the prose

No prior or current representation of the Halden Regional Transit District. The grievant and the Union share an aligned interest in overturning the discharge; the Union consents to the firm's representation of the grievant. No adverse relationship identified.

Checked date not yet mentioned in the prose

2025-11-04

Rate not yet mentioned in the prose

250

Engagement date restated in 3 passages (each needs its own edit)

2025-11-05

Adding a fact records it here first — it appears in the prose only through drafted mentions you approve.